> > No, with -O2 it breaks on
> > gcc-3.23.2.3-6
> > gcc-3.33.3.1-0rc1
> > gcc-snapshot 20030722-1
>
> but it did work with gcc-2.95?
There is no 2.95 on hppa.
Clint Adams writes:
> [this message only refers to testing that was only done on hppa]
>
> > - does it work with gcc-3.2?
> > - does it work with gcc-snapshot?
>
> No, with -O2 it breaks on
> gcc-3.23.2.3-6
> gcc-3.33.3.1-0rc1
> gcc-snapshot 20030722-1
but it did work with gcc-
Clint Adams writes:
> > > - can you identify the file beeing miscompiled?
> >
> > No, I don't seem to be able to do that. If I compile with -O1, it
> > works. If I compile with -O2, it segfaults. If I compile all objects
> > -O2 except the ones that seem to be relevant in the backtrace, it stil
> > - can you identify the file beeing miscompiled?
>
> No, I don't seem to be able to do that. If I compile with -O1, it
> works. If I compile with -O2, it segfaults. If I compile all objects
> -O2 except the ones that seem to be relevant in the backtrace, it still
> segfaults. (Also tried wi
[this message only refers to testing that was only done on hppa]
> - does it work with gcc-3.2?
> - does it work with gcc-snapshot?
No, with -O2 it breaks on
gcc-3.23.2.3-6
gcc-3.33.3.1-0rc1
gcc-snapshot 20030722-1
> - can you identify the file beeing miscompiled?
No, I don't
Clint Adams writes:
> Package: gcc
> Version: multiple
> Severity: normal
>
> The bogofilter test suite fails on m68k, hppa, mips, mipsel, and arm
> due to a segfault in bogoutil.
>
> On hppa, at least, compiling with -O0 or -O1 results in a working binary.
> Therefore I assume an optimization bu
Package: gcc
Version: multiple
Severity: normal
The bogofilter test suite fails on m68k, hppa, mips, mipsel, and arm
due to a segfault in bogoutil.
On hppa, at least, compiling with -O0 or -O1 results in a working binary.
Therefore I assume an optimization bug. (This was tested with
gcc-3.3 3.3.
7 matches
Mail list logo
