Processed: Re: Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one

2003-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 186139 [fixed in 3.3] [alpha] va_start is off by one Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one

2003-04-13 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
I tested newer versions of gcc-3.2 and gcc-snapshot. gcc-2.95 2.95.4-17 buggy, won't be fixed gcc-3.0 3.0.4-7 buggy, removed from unstable gcc-3.2 3.2.3-0pre8 buggy gcc-3.3 3.3-0pre2 fixed gcc-snapshot 20030410-1 fixed, unlike 20030314-1

Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one

2003-03-30 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, all these versions have the same bug: > > gcc-2.95 2.95.4-17 > gcc-3.0 3.0.4-7 > gcc-3.2 3.2.3-0pre6 > gcc-snapshot 20030314-1 However, gcc-3.3 3.3-0pre2 works correctly, and a control-center compiled with it does not suffer from Bu

Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one

2003-03-25 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - does the code example work with gcc-snapshot? > - does the code example work with 2.95 (or 3.0.4)? No, all these versions have the same bug: gcc-2.95 2.95.4-17 gcc-3.0 3.0.4-7 gcc-3.2 3.2.3-0pre6 gcc-snapshot 20030314-1

Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one

2003-03-24 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Coincidentally, I believe that Falk Hueffner fixed this in the GCC > source very recently. Just FYI. You're right, it's PR target/9700.

Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one

2003-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo writes: > Package: gcc-3.2 > Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre6 > Severity: normal > > In the attached program, failing_func should return its first > variadic argument, but somehow it returns wrong_value instead. > The main function exits with code 0 if the result is correct. - does th

Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one

2003-03-24 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:14:38PM +0200, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote: > Package: gcc-3.2 > Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre6 > Severity: normal > > In the attached program, failing_func should return its first > variadic argument, but somehow it returns wrong_value instead. > The main function exits with co

Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one

2003-03-24 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre6 Severity: normal In the attached program, failing_func should return its first variadic argument, but somehow it returns wrong_value instead. The main function exits with code 0 if the result is correct. I believe this is what causes Debian Bug#185973. #in