On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 10:08:36PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ryan Murray) writes:
>
> |> The branch of libtool that supports --tag has been totally untouched
> |> in cvs for at least two years.
>
> The multi-language-branch is dead, and has been merged into HEAD nearly
> t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ryan Murray) writes:
|> The branch of libtool that supports --tag has been totally untouched
|> in cvs for at least two years.
The multi-language-branch is dead, and has been merged into HEAD nearly
two years ago.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 10:06:31AM -0600, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> >Specifically, libjava, libffi, and boehm-gc will need to have Makefile.am
> >updated to work with the version of automake in use (1.4), and then those
> >directories will also have to be autoreconf'd
>
> I think you'll get more tr
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 05:27:45PM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote:
> >Ryan Murray provided a patch, which I attach here. Needed for the 3.3
> >branch as well. checked on mips{,el}-linux and i386-linux only.
> >
> >The patch touches a few Makefile.am's to remove the
> >--tag option to libtool (doesn't exis
On Jan 24, 2003, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch touches a few Makefile.am's to remove the
> --tag option to libtool (doesn't exist),
It does exist in the libtool.m4 that's in the top level of the
hierarchy, and that's what you're supposed to use. Not using it, and
removing
>Note that this will render the other libtool using subdirectories as
>broken until someone fixes up the automake/autoconf in that directory.
>
>Specifically, libjava, libffi, and boehm-gc will need to have Makefile.am
>updated to work with the version of automake in use (1.4), and then those
>dir
At 08:57 24.01.2003, Matthias Klose wrote:
Benjamin Kosnik writes:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:25:04 +0100
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Is it likely this will be addressed in the gcc-3.2 branch?
>
> Are you volunteering?
Ryan Murray provided a patch, which I attach here. Needed for
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 08:57:08AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Benjamin Kosnik writes:
> > On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:25:04 +0100
> > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >Is it likely this will be addressed in the gcc-3.2 branch?
> >
> > Are you volunteering?
>
> Ryan Murray provide
Benjamin Kosnik writes:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:25:04 +0100
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Is it likely this will be addressed in the gcc-3.2 branch?
>
> Are you volunteering?
Ryan Murray provided a patch, which I attach here. Needed for the 3.3
branch as well. checked on mips
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:25:04 +0100
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is it likely this will be addressed in the gcc-3.2 branch?
Are you volunteering?
-benjamin
Is it likely this will be addressed in the gcc-3.2 branch?
Ryan Murray writes:
> Package: gcc-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.2ds4-0pre5
> Severity: grave
>
> The version of libtool used to build this source package is too old to
> correctly support shared libraries for the Debian mips and mipsel
> architec
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.2ds4-0pre5
Severity: grave
The version of libtool used to build this source package is too old to
correctly support shared libraries for the Debian mips and mipsel
architectures. At least version (1.4.2-7) and higher correctly supports
them. You need to update all
12 matches
Mail list logo
