Petr Vandrovec writes:
> On 12 Jul 02 at 9:22, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > retitle 151196 [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc-2.95.4-9 ICE in kernel (matroxfb) code
> > tags 151196 + fixed
> > thanks
>
> My system still runs 'gcc-2.95.4' when I type 'gcc', so how it
> comes that you tag this fixed? I could un
retitle 151196 [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc-2.95.4-9 ICE in kernel (matroxfb) code
tags 151196 + fixed
thanks
Petr Vandrovec writes:
> Package: gcc-2.95
> Version: 2.95.4-9
>
> Hi,
> I removed debug prints from new matroxfb driver, and ... compiler
> died. Simplest example I was able to invent is be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 151196 [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc-2.95.4-9 ICE in kernel (matroxfb) code
Bug#151196: gcc-2.95.4-9 ICE in kernel (matroxfb) code
Changed Bug title.
> tags 151196 + fixed
Bug#151196: [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc-2.95.4-9 ICE in kernel (matroxfb) cod
On 12 Jul 02 at 9:22, Matthias Klose wrote:
> retitle 151196 [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc-2.95.4-9 ICE in kernel (matroxfb) code
> tags 151196 + fixed
> thanks
My system still runs 'gcc-2.95.4' when I type 'gcc', so how it
comes that you tag this fixed? I could understand 'wontfix', but
not 'fixed'.
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 2.95.4-9
Hi,
I removed debug prints from new matroxfb driver, and ... compiler
died. Simplest example I was able to invent is below. If you uncomment
printf(), or if you'll remove (almost) any line from computeRegs() body,
it will stop ICE.
gcc-3.0 (3.0.4-10) and
5 matches
Mail list logo