Re: Bug#126162: [sparc] unable to build gcc-3.0.3-1

2001-12-23 Thread Matthias Klose
Ben Collins writes: > On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 03:03:01AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > > > That's the problem...let me remove that package and put this bug on > > > binutils-multiarch. Try the build again Matthias. > > > > ok, the latter problem went away, however I still get the regressio

Re: Bug#126162: [sparc] unable to build gcc-3.0.3-1

2001-12-22 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Ben Collins wrote: > Which files? The compiler binaries themselves (gcc, cc1, etc) should be > sparc32. The libraries would be 64-bit. I just checked the binutils on > vore and it does report supporting elf64_sparc, so that message > shouldn't happen. Oh wait! binutils-multia

Bug#126162: [sparc] unable to build gcc-3.0.3-1

2001-12-22 Thread Ben Collins
reassign 126162 binutils-multiarch thanks On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:24:01PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Package: binutils,gcc-3.0 > Version: 2.11.92.0.12.3-3 > Severity: grave > Tags: help > > help needed ... > build log on vore:~doko/prot.3.0.1-1, build tree in gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds3. > > two

Bug#126162: [sparc] unable to build gcc-3.0.3-1

2001-12-22 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: binutils,gcc-3.0 Version: 2.11.92.0.12.3-3 Severity: grave Tags: help help needed ... build log on vore:~doko/prot.3.0.1-1, build tree in gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds3. two things: - executables generated with the new compiler terminate with bus errors. see the g++ testsuite: ===