Re: Bug#107587: gcc and gcc-3.0 should support alternatives

2001-08-08 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
Matthias Klose wrote: > > why do you propose gcc-3.0 as the "user compiler"? setting the "system > compiler" to something other than the "user compiler" would break > every C++ related development environment. Why? We use already different version of library at the same time (almost I use it, mos

Re: Bug#107587: gcc and gcc-3.0 should support alternatives

2001-08-06 Thread Matthias Klose
[please CC debian-gcc@lists.debian.org on replies] why do you propose gcc-3.0 as the "user compiler"? setting the "system compiler" to something other than the "user compiler" would break every C++ related development environment. Giacomo Catenazzi writes: > Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Giacom

Bug#107587: gcc and gcc-3.0 should support alternatives

2001-08-03 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
Package: gcc Version: 2:2.95.4-5 Severity: wishlist gcc should use 'update-alternative', so that user can define easily (and in a std manner) the default compiler. giacomo -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux gmiabla 2.4.8-pre3 #3 Tue Jul