On 26 Jul 01 at 18:26, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> > ncpfs code is affected by this (fortunately it still links as I
> > gave up teaching gcc to inline code long ago). And as there is no
> > documentation since when this option is supported, it is just guessing
> > (or someone has to add -flim
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:07:20PM +0100, David Starner wrote:
> From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:27:14PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > > Package: gcc-3.0
> > > Version: 3.0.1-0pre010723
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > gcc-3.0.1 contains some really unreasonable defau
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > Why not have the kernel Makefile pass "-flimit-inline=1" explicitly?
>
> Because of I see no reason for breaking documented behavior - also my
He's got a point here. The documentation says that the inlining limit
default is 1. I'll have t
From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:27:14PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > Package: gcc-3.0
> > Version: 3.0.1-0pre010723
> >
> > Hi,
> > gcc-3.0.1 contains some really unreasonable default
for -flimit-inline -
> > probably something around 100, but I did not look
On 26 Jul 01 at 16:11, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:27:14PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > Package: gcc-3.0
> > Version: 3.0.1-0pre010723
> > to change code to not inline, and I agree with him - 100 is completely
> > stupid, backward incompatible limit. Even rebuilding kernel
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:27:14PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.0
> Version: 3.0.1-0pre010723
>
> Hi,
> gcc-3.0.1 contains some really unreasonable default for -flimit-inline -
> probably something around 100, but I did not look at sources. Default is
> documented to be 1 -
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 3.0.1-0pre010723
Hi,
gcc-3.0.1 contains some really unreasonable default for -flimit-inline -
probably something around 100, but I did not look at sources. Default is
documented to be 1 - 100 times larger than current default is.
Is there some really good reason for
7 matches
Mail list logo