--- Comment #23 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2010-09-14 15:46 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Fixed everywhere but on 4.3 branch.
>
> Maybe commit the patch there too?
>
I think there is a smaller probability that this bug occurs in gcc4.3 because
it is based on the old RA. IRA us
--- Comment #22 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2010-09-13
17:54 ---
Fixed everywhere but on 4.3 branch.
Maybe commit the patch there too?
--
belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #21 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 18:38
---
Subject: Bug 45312
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Sep 9 18:37:58 2010
New Revision: 164118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164118
Log:
2010-09-09 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle-end/453
--- Comment #20 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 18:37
---
Subject: Bug 45312
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Sep 9 18:37:17 2010
New Revision: 164117
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164117
Log:
2010-09-09 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle-end/453
--- Comment #19 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 18:36
---
Subject: Bug 45312
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Sep 9 18:36:26 2010
New Revision: 164116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164116
Log:
2010-09-09 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle-end/453
--- Comment #18 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 19:18
---
(In reply to comment #17)
> I am thinking in the same direction. merge_assign_reloads is dated by 1993.
> Since then it was not practically changed. I guess postreload can remove
> unecessary loads if it is gen
--- Comment #17 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2010-09-07 18:03 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
>
>
> I just noticed that even in the complete absence of reload inheritance, the
> allocate_reload_reg routine performs free_for_value_p checks, and therefore
> implicitly takes reload order
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
||debia
8 matches
Mail list logo
