https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43660
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > [Note that the same issue exists with other ways of invoking using the
> > generator (e.g., a std::uniform_real_distribution with
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-04-06 11:00
---
Jon is right and recently I removed that old comment from random.h because
indeed was incorrect.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 10:53 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
>
> As best as I can tell, std::random_shuffle wants its random-number
> generating functor to return results in the range [0,N), where N is the
> parameter it passes to the functor; i.e., the
--- Comment #2 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 10:40 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> [Note that the same issue exists with other ways of invoking using the
> generator (e.g., a std::uniform_real_distribution with bounds of
> 0 and 1 will indeed return 1); but it's less clear i
--- Comment #1 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 10:38 ---
n1933 is ancient history, the RNG pieces have changed significantly
In the current draft it says:
"A uniform_int_distribution random number distribution produces random integers
i, a <= i <= b"
So it is a closed inter
5 matches
Mail list logo
