--- Comment #18 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 19:18
---
(In reply to comment #17)
> I am thinking in the same direction. merge_assign_reloads is dated by 1993.
> Since then it was not practically changed. I guess postreload can remove
> unecessary loads
--- Comment #3 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-23 14:51
---
I don't think the patch is correct; according to the C standard,
the third argument of memset is of type size_t, which must be
an *unsigned* type, so it cannot in fact be negative.
What apparently happens is
--- Comment #15 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 18:45
---
Fixed.
--
uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #14 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 18:44
---
Subject: Bug 21041
Author: uweigand
Date: Fri Dec 23 18:44:07 2005
New Revision: 109020
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109020
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/21041
*
--- Comment #13 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 18:38
---
Subject: Bug 21041
Author: uweigand
Date: Fri Dec 23 18:38:43 2005
New Revision: 109019
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109019
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/21041
*
--- Comment #12 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-18 16:06
---
Subject: Bug 21041
Author: uweigand
Date: Sun Dec 18 16:06:55 2005
New Revision: 108760
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108760
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/21041
*
--- Comment #11 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 18:05
---
Patch posted.
--
uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #30 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 01:08
---
With that patch applied, Ada bootstraps on s390-ibm-linux and
s390x-ibm-linux. Regression test results are at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-11/msg00831.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults
--- Comment #28 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 18:31
---
Just one additional comment: the patch from comment #10 was rejected,
maybe because it required changes to the core gimplifier.
However, I've tested just the Ada front-end pieces from that patch,
and
--- Comment #24 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-05 00:23
---
Well, the workaround removes the ICE, but constructor handling
appears still broken:
ada/sem_prag.o(.text+0xa58): In function
`sem_prag.analyze_pragma.check_no_identifier':
../../gcc-head/gcc/ada/sem_pra
--- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-21
17:38 ---
Could you try my updated patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-03/msg01772.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14663
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
11 matches
Mail list logo
