--- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-06-01
15:37 ---
Subject: Re: slightly misleading printf format warning
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:
> I also find the message overly terse. The abbreviated form "arg" for
> arg
--- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-04-27
14:44 ---
Subject: Re: [-Wconversion] incorrect conversion warning for
function taking a short
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, falk at debian dot org wrote:
> No, the message really means what it says. This warning
--- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-04-06
16:39 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] ICE in final.c:2117 when
compiling a huge source file
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, roger at eyesopen dot com wrote:
> [4] Expand EXPR_WITH_FILE_LOCATION's tree node so tha
--- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-01-12
23:52 ---
Subject: Re: toplev.c:4563-4567: gettext interprets
the two conditional strings as one
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, zack at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> It does no harm to translate this text, and this c
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11931
--- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2003-08-15
18:51 ---
Subject: Re: unjustified warning for C89 code using
HUGE_VAL
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003
5 matches
Mail list logo
