--- Comment #4 from janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-10-07 19:45 ---
The most recent break on mainline was by this patch from jakub:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-08/msg00974.html
The same patch was applied to the 4.0 branch, causing the failure in 4.0.2.
That patch from
--- Comment #3 from janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-10-06 22:21 ---
The list of work/fail versions is very odd for this bug; it seems to have
worked on mainline until sometime between 20050828 and 20050904. 3.3.5 passes,
but all 3.4.x versions I tried fail. 4.0.0 passes but 4.0.2
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-09-19
19:42 ---
A regression hunt on i686-linux showed the failure starting with this patch
from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg00640.html
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2003-12-10
22:56 ---
The regression in PR 13070 was introduced or exposed with this patch
to both mainline and the 3.3-branch:
2003-03-17 Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* decl.c (duplicate_decls): Use the ne
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2003-11-25
00:08 ---
The intermittent ICEs in common_handle_option and use of random options also
happens with a compiler built for i686-unknown-linux-gnu. There seem to be more
of these after September 20. These happen for
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2003-11-24
22:51 ---
The regression reported in PR 11634 still exists in the 3.3-branch
but was fixed on the mainline with this patch:
2003-09-03 Mostafa Hagog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gcse.c (replace_one_set
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11928
janis187 at us dot ibm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10700
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2003-06-25
00:59 ---
The (very old) regression in 10700 was introduced with this patch:
Sat Nov 27 08:38:26
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10700
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2003-06-25
00:59 ---
The (very old) regression in 10700 was introduced with this patch:
Sat Nov 27 08:38:26
9 matches
Mail list logo