--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-06-24 18:53
---
Still seems like we're missing a flow patch on the branch that I haven't had
time to dig up so definitely postponing this one. I'll see if I can track it
down at some point. Committing the c
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-06-19 15:53
---
Almost positive that's because of a flow patch that's not in 3.3.4 (or 3.4
branch as of the time I did this), but is in mainline and i'll verify 3.4 branch
as well.
--
http://gcc.g
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-04-02 08:29
---
I'll also use the testcase and put it into the gcc testsuite if that's cool?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14700
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You report
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-04-02 08:25
---
Created an attachment (id=6032)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6032&action=view)
combine.c patch
Here's a patch that I'm testing. it passes the testcase and seems to do
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |echristo at redhat dot com
|dot org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-03-29 19:25
---
Strange since the code I deleted was, in fact, optimization code for combine.
So, my patch did _less_ than we did before. This is probably exposing a bug
somewhere else in the compiler, but I'll take a loo
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11717
echristo at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
7 matches
Mail list logo
