--- Comment #17 from doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2008-06-25 22:16
---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] Miscompiled code with -O2 (but not with -O2
-funroll-loops) on ia64
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Anyway, can you help me reproduce the issue, so I can tak
--- Comment #3 from doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2006-04-24 13:30
---
Subject: Re: armv5te-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.1 fails to compile
libquicktime-0.9.7-0.4/plugins/opendivx/encore50/text_code_mb.c
Pjotr Kourzanov writes:
> Here it is. Compile with:
Pjotr, please don't in
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2005-07-25
22:07 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error on m68k-linux
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25
&
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2005-05-02
16:29 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 only] gfortran internal error in namelist read
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
>
> --- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23
> 16:16
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-07-30
16:16 ---
Subject: Re: [Bug AWT/16121] gtk based awt peers: cast from pointer to integer
of different size
falk at debian dot org writes:
> Okay, I will try to build a compiler with this patch. Can you sugg
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-07-27
16:49 ---
Subject: Re: [Bug AWT/16121] gtk based awt peers: cast from pointer to integer
of different size
fitzsim at redhat dot com writes:
>
> --- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-07-07
08:48 ---
Subject: Re: Bug#116145: fastjar update (-u) should be implemented
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-07
&
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-06-29
07:54 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression][alpha] ICE in subreg_hard_regno, at
emit-rtl.c:928
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-05-04
05:39 ---
Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] [m68k] bootstrap comparision failure
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-02
&
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-03-24
22:37 ---
Subject: description of -ffloat-store in gcc man page incorrect/inaccurate
On 2004-03-24 08:03:40 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
> > The second paragraph is incorrect. Th
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-03-22
06:02 ---
Subject: Re: [3.5 regression] bootstrap failure in libobjc (first .m file)
dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca writes:
> Could you let us know if there are any testsuite regressions?
h
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-03-21
18:11 ---
Subject: Re: [3.5 regression] bootstrap failure in libobjc (first .m file)
uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Could you try my updated patch at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-03-14
09:07 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-03-09
05:19 ---
Subject: Re: No std::bad_alloc::what() const
[resending for the inclusion to the Debian BTS]
Phil Edwards writes:
> close 236912
> thanks
>
> This bug report reinforces my opinion that
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-03-05
22:08 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] miscompilation with -O -funroll-loops on powerpc
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
>
> --- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-05
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-02-14
23:11 ---
Subject: Re: ICE building gnat for native m68k-linux on i486-linux
dhazeghi at yahoo dot com writes:
>
> --- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2004-02-14 21:22
> ---
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-01-29
06:47 ---
Subject: Re: Hopefully final patch for PR 13722
Jim Wilson writes:
> On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 12:02, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > CVS 20040128 including your patch fails in the first ada file in
&
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-01-28
20:07 ---
Subject: Re: Hopefully final patch for PR 13722
Zack Weinberg writes:
> Al Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I probably should have spoken up before but I was out of to
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-01-19
20:15 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 Regression] xnmake gets miscompiled during bootstrap
with ada enabled
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
>
> --- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu d
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-12-29
17:00 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] forward template declarations in
let inlining fail
> Module name: gcc
> Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-29 02:42:17
>
> Modified files:
&g
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-11-16
23:57 ---
Subject: Re: 3.3 / 3.4
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-16
> 23:09 ---
> Some at debian messed up bec
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-11-16
18:37 ---
Subject: Re: no way to exclude backward C++ headers from include path
paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
>
> --- Additional Comments From paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-16
&
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-10-14
19:36 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] miscompilation of ide-scsi linux kernel driver
pinskia
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-10-14
18:26 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare
pinskia at
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11793
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-10-14
17:56 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3.1 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175
pinskia at gcc
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-10-14
06:51 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-10-13
20:56 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-10-12
07:24 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-10-11
11:34 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12450
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-09-29
22:54 ---
Subject: Re: Constraint error for valid input
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-08-09
08:05 ---
Subject: Re: [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c
rsandifo at redhat
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-08-07
22:10 ---
Subject: Re: [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c
rsandifo at redhat
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-07-15
05:46 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation
and/or
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10692
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-07-12
09:07 ---
Subject: Re: Bug#187564: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] miscompilation of perl
with -O2
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-07-09
07:31 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation
and/or
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-07-08
04:50 ---
Subject: Re: Bug#173513: Inline constant function pointers
pinskia at physics dot uc
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9812
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-07-04
20:30 ---
Subject: Re: Bug#177840: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in extract_insn, at
recog.c
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11054
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-06-26
22:06 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [m68k] ICE in reg_overlap_mentioned_p
wilson at
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-06-20
09:32 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3.1 regression] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c
rearnsha
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-06-19
18:14 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3.1 regression] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c
[EMAIL
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-06-19
18:09 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3.1 regression] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c
[EMAIL
41 matches
Mail list logo
