On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:49:06AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 20.01.2010 09:22, dann frazier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> tags 565862 + moreinfo
>>> tags 565862 + help
>>> thanks
>>>
>>>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> tags 565862 + moreinfo
> tags 565862 + help
> thanks
>
> On 19.01.2010 04:58, dann frazier wrote:
>> Source: gcc-snapshot
>> Version: 20100117-1
>> Severity: serious
>> User: debian-h...@lists
Source: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20100117-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hppa
gcc-snapshot fails to build on hppa. From the most recent build attempt:
[...]
mv -f .deps/time.Tpo .deps/time.Plo
/bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile
/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_
Package: g++-4.3
Version: 4.3.4-6
Severity: normal
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hppa
netgen fails to build on hppa due to an internal compiler error.
Looks like the last successful build was:
The last successful build was:
netgen_4.4-5 with g++-4.0_4.0.3-1
Followed by the first
initial "contact"?
Good question. I took a trace following the instructions in
/usr/share/doc/fakeroot/DEBUG, and I'll attach it here since I don't
know how to decipher it myself.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
c/x86/ffi.c:425
[... continues to 424 frames ...]
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.2-6.1&arch=powerpc&file=log
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ilding in a sid
chroot with pbuilder - but, if I unpack the same pbuilder tarball on
the same system and do a manual build within, it succeeds (same
build-deps). Hopefully that means it will not be an issue for our
buildds.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
hmm.. now that I realize this is just a wrapper package, the bug makes
less sense. Perhaps one of the backend packages got upgraded recently,
fixing this issue? Will continue to look into it and follow up with
results.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
the first place)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
attached - interrupt to quit
msgrcv(1277955,
This has been hung on my system for several days, and happens
everytime. Downgrading to 1.0.77-4 works fine. I'm currently
testing other versions from snapshot to try and narrow down where the
regression was introduced.
--
dann frazier
-
Oops - sorry about the xmorph thing; cut & paste error. Thanks
Martin.
I don't see this bug in 4.1.1-4 - perhaps in was pascal related?
Anyway, it can probably be closed.
--
dann frazier | HP Open Source and Linux Organization
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
pointer at
../../src/gcc/expr.c:5378
Function `get_set_constructor_bits' implicitly converted to pointer at
../../src/gcc/expr.c:5378
- End forwarded message -
--
dann frazier | HP Open Source and Linux Organization
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ned indefinitely
to continue a major + major-1 support model.
I of course agree with you that there's no reason to preclude
user-built kernels; and we certainly need to maintain the upgrade path.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-3
Tags: patch
Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that will cause
your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer is
greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64.
[1]http://people.debian.org/~dannf/check-implicit-pointer
fyi, still exists in 1:3.3.5-13
--- Begin Message ---
Function `stpcpy' implicitly converted to pointer at
../../src/gcc/treelang/parse.c:2107
Function `stpcpy' implicitly converted to pointer at
../../src/gcc/treelang/parse.c:2107
--- End Message ---
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.6-2
Filing as a bug so we don't lose track of this...
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Matthias,
Are you already aware of the problem mentioned in the mail below?
Assuming the offending line is reachable at all, it will cause a
SIGSEGV on ia64 due to pointer-value truncati
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 08:56:04AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> hmm, the network card of my A500 is currently broken :-( Lamont,
> please could you check, if you can reproduce this? Dann, does
> recompiling apt fix the problem?
I re-upgrade the box, which has been up for 45 days & hasn't had any
Package: libstdc++5
Version: 1:3.3.4-13
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge
I upgraded a sarge hppa box to the latest bits, which brought in
libstdc++ 3.3.5-5. apt & aptitude began segfaulting:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Segmentation faulty Tree... 0%
[EMAIL
19 matches
Mail list logo