Bug#565862: FTBFS [hppa]: C compiler cannot create executables

2010-01-20 Thread dann frazier
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:49:06AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 20.01.2010 09:22, dann frazier wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> tags 565862 + moreinfo >>> tags 565862 + help >>> thanks >>> >>>

Bug#565862: FTBFS [hppa]: C compiler cannot create executables

2010-01-20 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > tags 565862 + moreinfo > tags 565862 + help > thanks > > On 19.01.2010 04:58, dann frazier wrote: >> Source: gcc-snapshot >> Version: 20100117-1 >> Severity: serious >> User: debian-h...@lists

Bug#565862: FTBFS [hppa]: C compiler cannot create executables

2010-01-18 Thread dann frazier
Source: gcc-snapshot Version: 20100117-1 Severity: serious User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hppa gcc-snapshot fails to build on hppa. From the most recent build attempt: [...] mv -f .deps/time.Tpo .deps/time.Plo /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile /build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_

Bug#558987: [hppa] Internal compiler error building netgen

2009-11-30 Thread dann frazier
Package: g++-4.3 Version: 4.3.4-6 Severity: normal User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hppa netgen fails to build on hppa due to an internal compiler error. Looks like the last successful build was: The last successful build was: netgen_4.4-5 with g++-4.0_4.0.3-1 Followed by the first

Re: Processed: reassign 499142 to fakeroot

2008-11-06 Thread dann frazier
initial "contact"? Good question. I took a trace following the instructions in /usr/share/doc/fakeroot/DEBUG, and I'll attach it here since I don't know how to decipher it myself. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#499142: backtraces point to gdb

2008-11-05 Thread dann frazier
c/x86/ffi.c:425 [... continues to 424 frames ...] -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#499142: not ia64 specific

2008-10-10 Thread dann frazier
2.2-6.1&arch=powerpc&file=log -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#499142: reassign/more info

2008-09-24 Thread dann frazier
ilding in a sid chroot with pbuilder - but, if I unpack the same pbuilder tarball on the same system and do a manual build within, it succeeds (same build-deps). Hopefully that means it will not be an issue for our buildds. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Bug#499142: narrowed down version

2008-09-16 Thread dann frazier
hmm.. now that I realize this is just a wrapper package, the bug makes less sense. Perhaps one of the backend packages got upgraded recently, fixing this issue? Will continue to look into it and follow up with results. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#499142: working eclipse source package

2008-09-16 Thread dann frazier
the first place) -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#499142: [ia64] hangs while building eclipse

2008-09-16 Thread dann frazier
attached - interrupt to quit msgrcv(1277955, This has been hung on my system for several days, and happens everytime. Downgrading to 1.0.77-4 works fine. I'm currently testing other versions from snapshot to try and narrow down where the regression was introduced. -- dann frazier -

Bug#373626: not present in 4.1.1-4

2006-06-15 Thread dann frazier
Oops - sorry about the xmorph thing; cut & paste error. Thanks Martin. I don't see this bug in 4.1.1-4 - perhaps in was pascal related? Anyway, it can probably be closed. -- dann frazier | HP Open Source and Linux Organization -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Bug#373626: gcc-4.1: implicit pointer conversion

2006-06-14 Thread dann frazier
pointer at ../../src/gcc/expr.c:5378 Function `get_set_constructor_bits' implicitly converted to pointer at ../../src/gcc/expr.c:5378 - End forwarded message - -- dann frazier | HP Open Source and Linux Organization -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#361024: note on "2.4 is deprecated"

2006-04-10 Thread dann frazier
ned indefinitely to continue a major + major-1 support model. I of course agree with you that there's no reason to preclude user-built kernels; and we certainly need to maintain the upgrade path. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr

Bug#320915: [Fwd: Log for successful build of gcc-4.0_4.0.1-3 (dist=unstable)]

2005-08-02 Thread dann frazier
Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-3 Tags: patch Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that will cause your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64. [1]http://people.debian.org/~dannf/check-implicit-pointer

Bug#308367: [Fwd: Log for successful build of gcc-3.3_1:3.3.5-13 (dist=testing)]

2005-05-26 Thread dann frazier
fyi, still exists in 1:3.3.5-13 --- Begin Message --- Function `stpcpy' implicitly converted to pointer at ../../src/gcc/treelang/parse.c:2107 Function `stpcpy' implicitly converted to pointer at ../../src/gcc/treelang/parse.c:2107 --- End Message ---

Bug#308367: [Fwd: gcc-3.3 potential crash]

2005-05-09 Thread dann frazier
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.6-2 Filing as a bug so we don't lose track of this... --- Begin Message --- Hi Matthias, Are you already aware of the problem mentioned in the mail below? Assuming the offending line is reachable at all, it will cause a SIGSEGV on ia64 due to pointer-value truncati

Bug#288817: apt-get and aptitude segfault on hppa

2005-01-07 Thread dann frazier
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 08:56:04AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > hmm, the network card of my A500 is currently broken :-( Lamont, > please could you check, if you can reproduce this? Dann, does > recompiling apt fix the problem? I re-upgrade the box, which has been up for 45 days & hasn't had any

Bug#288817: apt-get and aptitude segfault on hppa

2005-01-05 Thread dann frazier
Package: libstdc++5 Version: 1:3.3.4-13 Severity: grave Tags: sarge I upgraded a sarge hppa box to the latest bits, which brought in libstdc++ 3.3.5-5. apt & aptitude began segfaulting: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Segmentation faulty Tree... 0% [EMAIL