--- Comment #7 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-07 18:59 ---
We no longer regress with respect to this testcase (bootstrapping on my small
mipsel-linux system).
--
daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-05 17:34 ---
As of r129803, I can bootstrap c,c++,java on my mipsel-linux build machine with
128MB RAM again. Although some files require more than 128MB of virtual
memory, I have plenty of swap and the system does not thrash so
--
daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28313
--- You
--- Comment #19 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-06 16:00 ---
On the trunk (with the patch) there are no regressions with a full bootstrap
all default languages on mipsel-linux. The test cases passes also.
I say: Commit it!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #11 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 17:34 ---
I am bootstrapping the 'Proposed patch' on mipsel-linux with this test case
added:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-mips-options "-O2 -EB -mabi=64 -msym32 -mno-
--- Comment #9 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 06:32 ---
Fixing things up when we are calculating relocations does not seem like it will
work. We cannot go adding an offest to a %lo() relocation and expect it not to
overflow on occasion.
Probably we need to load the value
--- Comment #8 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 06:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=14154)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14154&action=view)
Reduced testcase.
--
daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|
--- Comment #7 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 05:46 ---
Here is what is happening:
The value of avenrun[0] is being passed to a function that takes an 32 bit int
parameter. Since avenrun is an array of 64 bit unsigned long, the conversion
to int can be done by loading an
--- Comment #6 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 04:27 ---
OK I can reproduce with my mips64-linux cross compiler. I wonder if it is
big-endian related...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 04:20 ---
I just tried this on a mipsel-linux compiler:
$ /home/ddaney/gccsvn/trunk-build/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/ddaney/gccsvn/trunk-build/gcc/ -v -S -mabi=64 -msym32 -mno-abicalls
-O2 pr33256.c
Reading specs from /home/ddaney
--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 15:42 ---
It should be working now.
--
daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 15:36 ---
Subject: Bug 28313
Author: daney
Date: Fri Aug 10 15:35:55 2007
New Revision: 127336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127336
Log:
PR libffi/28313
* configure.ac: Don
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 17:06 ---
I will commit n32/n64 support shortly.
--
daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 00:01 ---
Java just uses the unwinder in libgcc_s. The same one that C++ and C use. If
it is a problem with the unwinder one might expect to see it in those languages
as well.
However, it would seem to be somewhat system
--- Comment #47 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-01 08:29 ---
With RTH's "alternate patch" applied, I can now bootstrap mipsel-linux
The test results are here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-04/msg00036.html
And are substancially similar to wha
--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-12 16:28
---
Fixed by the patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2004-06-25 23:20:06 |2004-07-27 18:28:07
date|
18 matches
Mail list logo
