[Bug other/42715] [4.5 Regression] output_operand: invalid expression as operand

--- Comment #6 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-19 08:44 --- Mine (testing a patch) -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/32589] [4.3 Regression] exp_dbug.adb:981: error: invalid array index

--- Comment #7 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-06 00:36 --- FWIW, ppc-linux-gnu bootstrap failed with the same tree, but reverting to before the 2007-06-30 patch it worked again. ppc64-linux-gnu still failed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32589

[Bug tree-optimization/32589] [4.3 Regression] exp_dbug.adb:981: error: invalid array index

--- Comment #5 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-05 04:50 --- FWIW, I haven't been able to bootstrap on ppc64-linux-gnu after this patch went in. I'm not sure I'd tried a full bootstrap before (I've only very recently got easy access to a ppc box), but the

[Bug c++/26757] [4.2 regression] C++ front-end producing two DECLs with the same UID

--- Comment #26 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 05:11 --- Looks like it's fixed. -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |

[Bug target/23602] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, when configured for i486-linux

--- Comment #17 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-17 06:25 --- I failed to note this PR when I checked in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01039.html as revision 112170, sorry. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23602 --- You are receiving this

[Bug target/23602] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, when configured for i486-linux

--- Comment #16 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-21 02:11 --- Created an attachment (id=10694) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10694&action=view) Reduced testcase This reduced testcase triggers the same bug before Richard's patch if c