On Thursday 01 May 2003 06:57, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please can you check, if the behaviour is the same with g++-3.3?
>
Yes, it is. Attached is a program which shows this problem. Normally it will
work just fine however add -fno-rtti and it segfaults. Using -Wall -W
-pedantic does not give a
>
> If temporary breakage of some applications is acceptable, you can
> spread this over a couple of days, by tsorting the 1000 packages.
>
or do a staging in experimental or somewhere else. Upload everything there,
let people look at it for a day or two then move it over.
This staging could a
> * Add a Conflict with the non-`c' version of the package.
why can't we have both installed, just like the libfoo6 and libfoo6g situation??
>> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
>> string foo = "Some Mixed Case Text";
>> cout << foo << endl;
>> transform(foo.begin(), foo.end(), foo.begin(), tolower);
>
> The compiler can't properly resolve "tolower": The problem is that
> tolower is not only a function in namespace std, it
I need to have a copy of 2.95.2 installed and would like to keep 2.95.4 and 3.0
installed. What is involved in making a g++-2.95.2 package similar to the 3.0
package?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5 matches
Mail list logo
