Re: sh4 architecture into Wheezy

2011-04-26 Thread Neil McGovern
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:58:24PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > > We don't have faster hardware. > > We think of a too slow thing in a question > > A test of gcc of sh4 takes time. > When there is not a test, a package is done in about two days. > > How does sh4 become targeted for the r

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

2010-08-20 Thread Neil McGovern
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >I'm not sure there are any in the original, plugins and a greater > >optimisation level certainly aren't things which will solve specific > >problems. Could you highlight them for me? > > Having these features available for develop

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

2010-08-18 Thread Neil McGovern
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:36:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 11.08.2010 23:16, Neil McGovern wrote: > >Hi Matthias, > > > >Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. > > > >On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:42:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>gcc-4.5

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

2010-08-11 Thread Neil McGovern
Hi Matthias, Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:42:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > gcc-4.5 should be released with squeeze, at least on amd64 and i386. > gcc-4.5.1 was released a week ago, the first bug and regression fix > release after the initial gcc-4.5.0

Re: GCC 4.2 transition

2007-07-20 Thread Neil McGovern
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:51:47AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:33:01AM +0200, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > > Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback > > > fr