Re: Random panic in load_balance() with 3.16-rc

2014-07-29 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 27.07.2014 03:02, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 25/07/14 02:25, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> Attached is fair.s from Debian gcc 4.8.3-5. Does that look better? I'm >> going to try reproducing the problem with a kernel built by that now. > > It looks like gcc-4.9 Debi

Re: Random panic in load_balance() with 3.16-rc

2014-07-28 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 29.07.2014 01:48, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 27.07.2014 04:56, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> >>> Also, Michel - can you try this patch if you still have your >>> gcc-4.9.0 install, and send me the resulti

Bug#624354: Processed: Re: Bug#624354: ./xpcshell: error while loading shared libraries: ./libxul.so: R_PPC_REL24 relocation at 0x0f9f0148 for symbol `_restgpr_29_x' out of range

2011-08-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
there actual > legitimate uses of that "feature"? I don't know, and I agree this seems like a toolchain bug. But why not build with -O2 and stay out of the mess? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusi

Bug#624354: Processed: Re: Bug#624354: ./xpcshell: error while loading shared libraries: ./libxul.so: R_PPC_REL24 relocation at 0x0f9f0148 for symbol `_restgpr_29_x' out of range

2011-08-29 Thread Michel Dänzer
nted iceweasel from starting at all for me, as one of them ended up unresolvable. AFAICT the libstartup-notification0 problem should be fixed now. Is this just a gcc -Os / binutils bug that should be worked around at least for now by building with -O2? I'm successfully running iceweasel with li

Bug#624354: Processed: Re: Bug#624354: ./xpcshell: error while loading shared libraries: ./libxul.so: R_PPC_REL24 relocation at 0x0f9f0148 for symbol `_restgpr_29_x' out of range

2011-04-29 Thread Michel Dänzer
into libxul.so, and it also contains > > R_PPC_REL24 relocations, but all the objects it contains are built > > -fPIC. > > And this is a -Os bug, apparently. Building with -O2 doesn't seem to > yield these relocations. Same with gcc-4.6 FWIW. -- Earthling Michel Dä

Bug#190791: gcc-3.2: random failure

2003-04-25 Thread Michel Dänzer
Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre9 Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This version of gcc-3.2 fails randomly, like {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:20570: Error: value of 7f3ffab00deb1268 too large for field of 4 bytes at 09a