Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 20:36, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > > On 2024-01-29 01:33, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On the Bugzilla report a patch has been linked, would it be possible to > > backport it, please? > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/6441

Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 16:38, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > > Hi Luca, > > On 2024-01-29 01:33, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > This causes systemd to FTBFS on armel since the new upload of > > libatomic-14. No other architecture is affected. > > > > cc -o systemd-

Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel

undefined reference to `libat_test_and_set_1_i2' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status On the Bugzilla report a patch has been linked, would it be possible to backport it, please? https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/644147.html -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: using spec file or patchelf for Debian packages to canonicalize ld path [was: Switching GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER in Trixie]

On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 10:57, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Luca Boccassi: > > > On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 23:08, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> > >> * Luca Boccassi: > >> > >> > But the more I think about it, the more I am convinced that the > &g

Re: using spec file or patchelf for Debian packages to canonicalize ld path [was: Switching GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER in Trixie]

On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 23:17, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 23:08, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > * Luca Boccassi: > > > > > But the more I think about it, the more I am convinced that the > > > default option working best for Debian i

Re: Switching GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER in Trixie

On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 23:08, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Luca Boccassi: > > > But the more I think about it, the more I am convinced that the > > default option working best for Debian is the one that matches the > > project's choice of a filesystem layout. After

Switching GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER in Trixie

to be updated. But for the vast, vast majority of cases, does anybody see any obvious issues? There are precedents for this, I was told GUIX patches PT_INTERP distro-wide already to point to its store, so it does not seem that far fetched as an idea. Thoughts? [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-dev

Bug#971659: dwz: please consider uploading 0.13-5 to buster-backports

On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 09:26 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: tags -1 + wontfix > > On 10/4/20 2:19 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > Package: dwz > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Dear Maintainer(s), > > > > Please consider uploading dwz version 0.

Bug#971659: dwz: please consider uploading 0.13-5 to buster-backports

x27;m working to backport spirv-tools, if there are no objections I'll NMU to delayed/3 within a couple of days. Thanks! Kind regards, Luca Boccassi