On 06/27/2018 10:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> As part of the interim architecture qualification for buster, we request
> that DSA, the security team and the toolchain maintainers review and
> update their list of known concerns for buster release architectures.
>
Everyone, please avoi
VM
>>support uncertain. (DSA)
>>- Source: [DSA Sprint report]
>>
>> [DSA Sprint report]:
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2018/02/msg4.html
>
> In this report Julien Cristau wrote:
>
>> In short, the hardware (development boards) we'
erity -1 serious
>
>On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 09:53:21PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 07:39:27PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > Control: severity -1 normal
>> > Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>> >
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 14:11:49 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: libmpfr6
> Version: 4.0.0-5
> Severity: serious
>
> Mixing libmpfr4 and libmpfr6 doesn't work well:
>
> flint-arb FTBFS with:
> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libmpfr.so.4, needed b
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 21:33:56 +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: severity -1 serious
>
> breaking packages is serious enough to me
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meson/+bug/1698463
>
> is an example of affected package.
>
> Raising the severity accordingly
>
You may
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 13:13:35 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: gcc-4.9-base
> Version: 4.9.1-19
> Severity: important
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> please sync the Breaks between gcc-4.8-base and gcc-4.9-base s.t. both
> include Breaks: gcc-4.7-b
Control: severity -1 normal
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 15:49:49 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> On 2013-01-17 16:10, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > how are the chances of getting this fix in sid and wheezy?
> >
> > I just verified that this really fixes
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:14:15 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> # apt-get --no-y dist-upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> gcc-4.7-base gcj-4.7-base
Source: gdc-4.6
Version: 0.29.1-4.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
From the kbsd-i386 build log:
> /build/buildd-gdc-4.6_0.29.1-4.6.3-1-kfreebsd-i386-8zg7gt/gdc-4.6-0.29.1-4.6.3/build/./gcc/gdc
>
> -B/build/buildd-gdc-4.6_0.29
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May.
>
So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need
to NMU?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Source: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.118
Severity: serious
gcc-defaults shouldn't migrate to wheezy until there's an agreement
between the gcc maintainers and release team about the 4.7 situation.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:42:21 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I am only aware of these usertags:
> debian...@lists.debian.org / qa-ftbfs-20120508
> do you known about a new rebuild?
>
No, I've seen bugs being filed from watching -bugs-rc.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital sig
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>> The intent to get GC
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The intent to get GCC changed was mentioned in the bug reports a month ago.
Seeing the number of new bug reports that keep popping up I still think
the switch should be reverted. It was bad enough with all the month old
bugs still o
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 18:55:49 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> awesome, libchamplain ftbfs with an ICE in gcc-4.7
> yeah for switching the default compiler
> doko: It looks like I'm going to take up your offer. Please fix that.
> doko: you have your first problem of gcc-4.7 breaking an ongoin
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 18:55:49 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> strigi was fixed, the gnome-commander and hugin builds were both tried on
> brahms (and did succeed on other architectures).
>
Other architectures didn't switch to 4.7.
> > What's worse is that at least for the last two, there were
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Default to GCC 4.7 for gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386,
> kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386.
Please revert this change. There are still too many open bugs on
h
Package: libppl0.11-dev
Version: 0.11.2-6
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
Hi,
libppl0.11-dev is marked as Multi-Arch: same, but contains files in
arch-independent paths with arch-specific contents:
[libppl0.11-dev 0.11.2-6]
usr/bin/ppl-config
Package: libppl-swi
Version: 0.11.2-6
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
Hi,
libppl-swi is marked as Multi-Arch: same, but contains files in
arch-independent paths with arch-specific contents:
[libppl-swi 0.11.2-6]
usr/bin/ppl_pl
Cheers,
Julien
Package: libisl-dev
Version: 0.08-1
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
Hi,
libisl-dev is marked as Multi-Arch: same, but contains files in
arch-independent paths with arch-specific contents:
[libisl-dev 0.08-1]
usr/include/isl/stdint.h
be46482
Package: libffi5-dbg
Version: 3.0.10-3
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
Hi,
libffi5-dbg is marked as Multi-Arch: same, but contains files in
arch-independent paths with arch-specific contents:
[libffi5-dbg 3.0.10-3]
usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libff
Package: gcc-4.4-base
Version: 4.4.7-1
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
Hi,
gcc-4.4-base is marked as Multi-Arch: same, but contains files in
arch-independent paths with arch-specific contents:
[gcc-4.4-base 4.4.7-1]
usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4-base
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Apparently the latest gcc-defaults stopped building the gdc package on
the archs listed in $subject, so the ood packages should be removed.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 23:43:03 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> doko, you said merging gcc-4.6 4.6.2-4 into gnat-4.6 would fix this
> FTBFS but it hasn't. The buildd log does not indicate the exact version
> of gcc-4.6 installed on the machine; perhaps I should tighten the
It does, it was gcc-4.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 23:57:48 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Perl. Nevertheless, if you would have googled for "gengtype: Internal
> error: abort in get_output_file_with_visibility, at gengtype.c:1998" you
> would have found #637236, which you could have used just as well to
> block the transi
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 23:32:48 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> retitle 649307 FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64: gengtype: Internal error: abort in
> get_output_file_with_visibility, at gengtype.c:1998
> reassign 649307 src:gcc-4.6
> severity 649307 important
> forcemerge 649307 637236
> thanks
>
> Julie
Source: gnat-4.6
Version: 4.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
See the build log at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gnat-4.6&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=4.6.2-2&stamp=1321357341
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Source: gnat-4.6
Version: 4.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
See the build log at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gnat-4.6&arch=armel&ver=4.6.2-2&stamp=1321391128
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 15:26:07 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Package: gcc-4.6
> Version: 4.6.1-1
> Severity: normal
> Blocks: 633373
>
> gcc-4.6 seems to miscompile libgcrypt11 on armel, causing total
> failure of gnutls26.
>
> ---
> (sid)ametzler@abel:~/GNUTLS$ ~
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 14:08:00 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I'm wondering. Is the project at large aware that we're not building for
> i486, but for i586 ? That even the maintainer doesn't know why for
> sure[1] and that no changelog entry documents when or why that happened?
> (nothing in debian
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 16:41:23 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 04/26/2011 09:39 AM, Neil McGovern wrote:
> >I woudn't be particularly happy with that unless the gcc maintainers ok
> >it, and I'm still not sure that two days is also an acceptable
> >timescale.
>
> then please drop mips and mip
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 18:20:09 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: libapron-dev
> Version:0.9.10-5
> Severity: serious
>
> libapron-dev depends on libppl0.10-dev, which doesn't exist anymore in
> unstable, now removed by ftp-master. Please depend on libppl0.11-dev
> instead.
>
Well. Or li
Package: gpc
Version: 1.97
Severity: serious
gpc-4.1 has been removed, which makes gpc (and gpc-doc) uninstallable.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://list
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 14:20:56 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Not sure, if the release team wants such kind of patches at this
> stage. At least the version in unstable didn't yet migrate. I won't
> do this update anyway, mostly offline until Feb 13.
>
No, we're only fixing release critical bu
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:29:07 -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Matt Turner, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 19:51:10 -0500, a écrit :
> >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >> > What's the actual problem --as-needed is trying to so
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:43:23 +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> >
> > > tags 595884 + sid
> > Bug #595884 [ppl] ppl: FTBFS in squeeze: /bin/bash: plld: command not found
> > Added tag(s) sid.
>
> Would you mind elaborating
Package: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-13
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
See e.g.
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=base-installer&arch=armel&ver=1.111&stamp=1283683945&file=log&as=raw
and a few others from arcadelt or antheil.
> make[2]: Entering directory
> `/build/buil
notfixed 591155 0.10.2-7
kthxbye
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 21:00:07 -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > xpdf-utils: Depends: poppler-utils but it is not going to be installed
> > E: Broken packages
>
That's 586620, not a bug in this package, fix
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
> Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to our users?
> There is a complete list here [0], but those ones are, in my opinion,
> very nice:
> - The new link time optimiser.
> - Improved C++0x support.
> - Plugins suppo
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 19:12:37 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Personally, I'd be comfortable with gcc-4.5 in Squeeze except for this
> part:
>
> > - the upload will build several runtime libraries from the 4.5
> > sources. Regression tests did pass for the runtime libs built
> > from the 4
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 16:00:37 +1000, Robert Ancell wrote:
> Package: libffi-dev
> Version: 3.0.9-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: squeeze
Please don't use distribution tags unless the bug is actually specific
to that branch (as opposed to the package version).
> Justification: renders package unus
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:13:19 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> In both cases it would be nice if you'd tag those bugs (FTBFS with
> gcc-4.4 and 4.5) with sid+squeeze, so that they dont show up as RC
> bugs for stable, for packages which have the same version in lenny.
>
Except you don't want the
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 23:22:36 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> We only build the user-docs nowadays, and that actually wouldn't be necessary
> if
> Debian's build system did what the policy says: There is no need to re-build
> the
> architecture independent stuff on each and every host, but
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 08:00:18 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-14 09:54]:
> > * Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-13 10:12]:
> > > Still ICE with -O1. Runs ok with -O0.
> > This is now PR34091.
>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:52:27 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I've reproduced the error, preprocessed source is
> paer.debian.org:~jcristau/mesa-7.0.2/obj-hppa-linux-gnu/debian-osmesa16/src/mesa/swrast/s_texfilter.i
> (not attached here because it's over 600k).
>
> It
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.2-3
Severity: important
Hi,
mesa FTBFS on hppa with a gcc ice:
gcc -c -I../../include -I../../src/mesa -I../../src/mesa/main
-I../../src/mesa/glapi -I../../src/mesa/math -I../../src/mesa/tnl
-I../../src/mesa/shader -I../../src/mesa/shader/grammar
-I../../src/mesa/
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:06:02 -0600, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Package: gcc-4.2
> Version: 4.2.2-3
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> netgen fails to build on hppa, see build log at
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=netgen&arch=hppa&ver=4.4-8&sta
Package: gij-4.2
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
$ cat debian/gij-hppa
#! /bin/sh
prctl=
case "$(prctl --unaligned=)" in *signal)
echo >&2 "$(basename $0): ignore unaligned memory accesses"
prctl="prctl --unaligned=default"
esac
exec $prctl /usr/
-gcc from the
Mail-Followup-To.
Cheers,
Julien Cristau
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
utils 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 and libc6.1-dev 2.3.5-5.
Does anyone know of an alpha-related change in the toolchain between
these versions, which could have caused this?
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get a meaningful backtrace with gdb (I
only know that the segfault occurs at program startup).
Than
50 matches
Mail list logo
