https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
--- Comment #217 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020, vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net wrote:
> According to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_status
> the possible status are UNCONFIRMED, CONFIRM
available here:
http://clang.debian.net/logs/2015-01-23/libffi_3.1-2_unstable_clang.log
Thanks,
Joseph
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.0.4-2-ARCH (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Loca
--- Comment #15 from joseph dot h dot garvin at gmail dot com 2010-01-21
18:38 ---
I'm not sure what the standard says, but conceptually, if you only provide a
template generic template foo, with no non-templated foo defined, then
instantiations of foo are *never* 'overloa
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-22 10:22 ---
Subject: Re: exception propagation support not enabled
in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa}-linux
On Fri, 22 May 2009, mikpe at it dot uu dot se wrote:
> Created an attachment (id=17900)
--> (http://gcc.g
--- Comment #24 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-23 19:01
---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4
in libstdc++ not exported anymore
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #21 from jakub at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #20 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-22 23:34
---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4
in libstdc++ not exported anymore
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote:
> > From glibc's perspective
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-12-02 01:36 ---
Subject: Re: New: Use of Unicode quotes depends on LC_CTYPE
rather than LC_MESSAGES
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org wrote:
> gcc uses Unicode quote marks with LC_CTYPE=en_US.UT
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-02-03 16:24 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] mips: unable to find a
register to spill in class 'FP_REGS'
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Fixed in GCC-4.2.0
>
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-02-03 16:22 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] invalid parameter
forward declarations not diagnosed
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> won't fix in GCC-4.0.x. Adjusting m
why you closed the bug. Policy is quite clear on
the issue, as quoted below. wontfix is your own perogative, of course.
Would you object to including a manpage if it were sent to you?
--Joe
> Joseph Nahmias writes:
> > reopen 406289
> > thanks
> >
> > On Wed, Jan
reopen 406289
thanks
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:35:34AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Joe Nahmias writes:
> > Package: gcc
> > Version: 4:4.1.1-15
> >
> > The program '/usr/bin/gcc' is missing a manpage as required by Debian
> > Policy,
> > section 12.1.
>
> no, in the gcc-doc package (non-fre
this list because I was wondering:1. Could this have anything to do with updated g++ packages.2. Could someone who understands how the g++ compiler works on arm just take a look at texmaker.
Thanks for everything. Joseph Smidt
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-23
13:17 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.1 regression, hppa] bootstrap error
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org wrote:
> ../../src/gcc/crtstuff.c:489: internal compiler error: tree check: expec
Best software prices.
http://lkbnp.shw7vrsl7ksz7ts.trophemahi.info
Never to suffer would never to have been blessed.
Riches cover a multitude of woes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enabling the digital future.
http://ahsyi.ahe7vrslp2shpta.swirlykc.com
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
The greater man the greater courtesy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-30
11:24 ---
Subject: Re: wrong parsing of "long long double"
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au wrote:
> Mainline is fixed.
> pr6634.i:1: error: both 'long long' a
t;. This requirement
remains unless the problem with the portability of the generated code has
been fixed, as GCC is unlikely to presume a C99 library on the host for
another decade.
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nd I know various other GCC maintainers
don't like them either, but it's RMS who would need to authorise any
licence change; patches (as Zack sent some time ago
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg01687.html>) to remove them
are useless without prior FSF approval.
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
comments on what ought to be done.
I expect a patch that followed the GNU and GCC coding standards, including
thorough testcases, and implemented the simple specification I gave for
-Wconversion (warn for any implicit conversion that may change a value),
would get reviewed.
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(probably
a few hundred lines, likely rather longer than the rest of the patch) for
all the different cases of implicit conversion that do warn, or don't warn
because that type conversion can't change values, or don't warn because
that conversion is converting a constant (etc.) to the same value.
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virtue of the requirement (6.7.3#8 in C99) that a type qualifier
applied to an array type applies instead to the element type. Thus the
case of 6.5.16.1#1 that would be matched in the case of pointers to
nonarray types adding qualifiers is not matched, thus the warning.
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
That's perfectly fine, especially given that that a new compiler version
can be expected to break a partial make and auto* will not know it needs
to rebuild everything.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Intelligent backside at large
Studies prove that research caus
ike.
Please consider it, at any rate.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Free software developer
but, then I used an Atari, I was more likely to win the lottery in ten
countries simultaneously than get accelerated X
pgpj7kTlMcFF5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
3 The GNU C compiler.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Free software developer
* james would be more impressed if netgod's magic powers could stop the
splits in the first place...
* netgod notes debian developers are notoriously hard to impress
pgprk2EXheOuJ.pgp
24 matches
Mail list logo
