Re: Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

2006-11-02 Thread John Schmidt
On Saturday 19 August 2006 07:03, Matthias Klose wrote: > Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > > On 18 August 2006 at 00:58, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > | * John Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-17 13:46]: > > | > Is there a way for me to instrument my code/system, etc to

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

2006-09-26 Thread John Schmidt
bug report -- bug 3111 that seems to correlate with my experiences and Dirk's. I will follow-up with binutils folks on this problem. Dirk -- could you try and see if downgrading binutils to something less than 2.17-1 restores saner link times? John Schmidt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

2006-09-24 Thread John Schmidt
m not sure if the reported behavior in the GCC bug (25468) and fix would have any bearing on link times, but I would be happy to try this fix out. Thanks, John Schmidt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

2006-09-12 Thread John Schmidt
and no '-g' and the link times with g++-4.1 are on the order of a couple of seconds. With '-g' on, link times are on the order of 10 minutes. John Schmidt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

2006-08-19 Thread John Schmidt
On Saturday 19 August 2006 07:03, Matthias Klose wrote: > Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > > On 18 August 2006 at 00:58, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > | * John Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-17 13:46]: > > | > Is there a way for me to instrument my code/system, etc to

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

2006-08-17 Thread John Schmidt
On Thursday 17 August 2006 04:00, you wrote: > * John Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-16 18:32]: > > I have a big c++ application that creates quite a few shared libraries > > and it takes on the order of 10 minutes for the creation of one of my > > libraries (no

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

2006-08-16 Thread John Schmidt
brary only takes at most 30 seconds. This is with a debug build and no optimization. As it stands g++-4.1 is not useable for my situation. Thanks, John Schmidt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gnu.linkonce.t messages for g++-3.3

2005-10-19 Thread John Schmidt
On Monday 17 October 2005 09:43 pm, John Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to compile a large c++ application. Without any optimizations > (debug has been enabled) the code compiles fine. However, when I turn on > -O2 optimzations, I get the following: > > g++-3.3 -Wl,-r

gnu.linkonce.t messages for g++-3.3

2005-10-17 Thread John Schmidt
luded-gettext --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-debug i486-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-10) and binutils: binutils 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 John Schmidt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ICE without -save-temps, no ICE with -save-temps

2005-09-30 Thread John Schmidt
this before. In reporting g++ ICEs, should I submit them to bugs at gcc or to the debian bug page? Thanks, John Schmidt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]