Package: gcc-snapshot
Hi!
Installing the `gcc-snapshot` binary package, there's README.Debian
(in the source package, this is README.snapshot), which (in two
places) shows how to assign LD_LIBRARY_PATH (and PATH) extended values
to allow to use the snapshot compiler.
These two assignments are
Hi!
After poking around, I guess this is actually a glibc issue and it's
probably already fixed by this commit:
jbglaw@lili:/var/cache/git/glibc$ git show
3e5760fcb48528d48deeb60cb885a97bb731160c | head -20
commit 3e5760fcb48528d48deeb60cb885a97bb731160c
Author: Joseph Myers
Date: Wed Sep 28
sin.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY;
printf ("sin len %d\n",len);
socket_fd = socket (AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0);
res = bind (socket_fd, (struct sockaddr *) &sin, len);
printf ("res = %d, errno = %s\n", res, strerror (res? errno: 0));
t_fd, &sin, len);
>
> printf ("res %d\n",res);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> problem doesn't seem any more specific to Ada ?
`errno' should contain more detailed information about why it failed.
Also, keep in mind that "sin.sin_port = 5786" is
hat... (And this isn't a compiler issue, so it's
offtopic here.)
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481 _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf| Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bür
On Thu, 2003-08-07 08:34:37 +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jan-Benedict Glaw writes:
> > Would Debian accept two ix86 distributions? One i386 and, say, i[56]86?
>
> No, unless you can explain why you need to run KDE,
On Thu, 2003-08-07 07:58:01 +0200, Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jan-Benedict Glaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Am I wrong or did we, "forced" because we wanted to be binary compatible
> > to some major
On Wed, 2003-08-06 15:52:31 -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jan-Benedict Glaw said:
> >...and up to now, I haven't seen real hard numbers that show that
> >optimizing for i486 does really make anything noticeab
On Wed, 2003-08-06 17:22:19 -0400, Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:08:22PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Jan-Benedict Glaw writes:
>
> Someone is making statements without knowing the real situation.
On Thu, 2003-08-07 00:48:04 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:43:35AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-08-06 23:08:22 +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > w
ault?
-mcpu=i386 -mtune=i486, at least for Linux based targets:-)
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf| Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |
On Wed, 2003-08-06 23:08:22 +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jan-Benedict Glaw writes:
> > i386 seems to die, sun4m also does have servere problems... Where does
> > this lead to? All these seem to arise from doing optimiz
On Wed, 2003-08-06 20:11:32 +0200, Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jan-Benedict Glaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Having a "broken" libstdc++ is already bad enough. Please, please please
> > please pl
e no installed userbase, so
> it is, perhaps, less crucial to support extremely old processors for this
> (especially if Linux continues to support them).
Linux supports them, but Debianish ./configury makes it hard because the
emulator isn't available eg. for 2.6.x (and at all, his autho
e we'd go another way and build two distributions - i386 as well as
i486 or i586. I bet there are still i386 machines out there, but they're
not updated that often. Please don't cut their update pathes...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-
15 matches
Mail list logo
