On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:55:20 +, Steve Cotton wrote:
> I've spent a while looking at what runs what, and realised that it will be
> quite time consuming for someone not familiar with your package to extact
> a test case.
>
> Would it be possible for you to isolate the gsf-scan bit;
.c and .
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: causes libgsf to no longer build from source; regression
compared to testing's gcc-4.3 packages.
What am I trying to do:
* Build libgsf from source again on amd64 (or build libgsf svn trunk).
How am I trying to do it / steps to re
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.0.1-3
Severity: important
This package currently has "Priority: optional", but apt in sid, which has
priority "important" now depends on it. libstdc++6's priority should be
bumped accordingly. This will hopefully fix "debootstrap" for sid, which
currently fails with
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 18:15:25 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> It's a bug in the code, not in the compiler. Compiler can't do any
> type-checking for variable argument functions.
>
> Well, gcc has some logic implemented specially for printf and company,
> maybe it should be fixed.
When I
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 12:27:20 +1000, Anand Kumria wrote:
> Downloaded and compiled the (well attempted to) latest Linux 2.6.5
> kernel. Interestingly running make a second time means it doesn't ICE.
> Annoyingly when I 'make clean; make V=1' to get the full command line
> the ICE is in another
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 19:53:26 +0100, Martin Godisch wrote:
> sh.dir.c:641: internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at
> reload1.c:8353
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> What's
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 14:59:11 +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.3-0pre3
> Severity: important
> To day I can't compile gnome-panel 2.4.2 :
gnome-panel 2.4.2-1 compiles fine for me in an up to date pbuilder sid
chroot on i386 with gcc 1:3.3.3-0pre3 .
> panel-
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 10:58:35 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I'll make an upload today or tomorrow.
That would be great.
You may want to have a look at the buildd logs for my NMU; they're not very
encouraging:
alpha:
../.././xgpc -B../.././ -c -g -I. -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 12:44:47 -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Will you fix the other grave bug, too, then?
I didn't look at that one in detail - cursory reading left the impression
that there wasn't one clear solution yet.
> It's a trivial fix in the rules file to include the file in the archive.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 23:48:59 -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
> the spec file for mips and mipsel have -lthread, rather than -lpthread,
> breaking all builds that involve pthreads.
Matthias fixed this in upstream CVS already, but not in an upload
apparently. I'm now uploading an NMU with his patch.
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 12:18:10 -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> I am thus trying to re-libtoolize and re-autoconf the package using
> current cygwin tools and to change a few things in configure.am file.
>
> Unfortunatelly while running autoconf - I am getting a bunch of errors if
> I try t
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 16:25:39 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> [I'm not subscribed to debian-gcc]
>
> I posted this o debian-user a few days back. I'm wondering if cpp needs
> to depend on g++.
I see no reason to. The preprocessor typically isn't used as a stand-alone
application. It is typically
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 11:18:22 +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> Bad RAM after all?
It can't hurt to check up on http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ .
Ray
--
UNFAIR Term applied to advantages enjoyed by other people which we tried
to cheat them out of and didn't manage. See also DISHONESTY, SNEAKY,
UND
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 13:31:48 +0200, Arnauld Michelizza wrote:
> hell:/home/am# dpkg --configure libstdc++2.10-dev
> Setting up libstdc++2.10-dev (2.95.4-18) ...
> sh: line 1: /usr/share/info/iostream-2.95.info.gz: No such file or directory
> install-info(/usr/share/info/iostream-2.95.info.gz):
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 00:15:31 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.3-doc
>As an extension, GNU CPP permits string literals to cross multiple
> lines without escaping the embedded newlines.
> This no longer seems to be the case, however:
Indeed, this piece of documentation is out
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 19:43:21 +0200, Jose Antonio Salgueiro wrote:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 3.3-1
>
> Compiling kernel 2.4.20
> net/network.o(.text+0xd887): In function `rtnetlink_rcv':
> : undefined reference to `rtnetlink_rcv_skb'
> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
This is fixed in 2.4.21-rc3:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 14:08:19 -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> This looks like a genuine bug.
I concur.
> So /lib/64 is a symlink in libc6-sparc64, but a directory in libgcc1.
libgcc1 should be changed to install in /lib64 rather than /lib/64 .
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:19:48 +0200, Martin v.
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: unclear, perhaps 1:3.2.3-0pre9 ?
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Severity motivation: ice-on-legal-code when building a package that's not
supposed to percolate to testing (#180052).
Buildd builds of gnumeric 1.1.x on m68k have been failing with an ICE for
some time n
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 20:40:11 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> that disconcerts me, I thought -Wall would include all warnings.
No, it never has and never will. -Wall is probably best described as "all
warnings the gcc developers consider useful under allmost all
circumstances".
Ray
--
"People s
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 17:31:43 -0700, Cyrus Kriticos wrote:
> i had installed Debian woody, and I set everything to unstable in the
> sources.list file. Then I did an apt-get upgrade only later to realize
> that I never selected gcc in the initial installation. So With unstable in
> my sources.li
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 14:28:29 +0100, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
> Package: g++-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre8
I can reproduce your problem with that version, but with gcc version 3.3
20030129 (prerelease) (packaged as gcc-snapshot 20030129-1) I get the
following much more acceptable result:
internal-
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 15:42:56 +0100, Elmar Haneke wrote:
> I did download the packages but I did have to force configuration since
> theere are cyclic references between the compiler and the libs (the same
> is true for the C++ compiler).
There have been for years. And dpkg has supported instal
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.4-15
Severity: normal
imagemagick FTBFS on ARM; see #171972 and
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=imagemagick . This is a
simplified and stripped down testcase for that issue (derived from the
imagemagick 5.5.2.5 sources).
-- System Information:
Debian
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:37:00 -0400, Russell E. Dolly wrote:
>This code produces the following error message:
>/tmp/ccuDTnJ1.0 in fuction 'main'(.text+0x11):undefined reference to
>'atan'
>I seems if find the header file, but not the defintion.
Indeed. Did you specify "link agai
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:28:15 -0400, Kapil Khosla wrote:
> dpkg -l g++-2.95
>
> ii g++-2.95 2.95.4-7 The GNU C++ compiler.
>
> dpkg -l binutils
> ii binutils 2.12.90.0.1-4 The GNU assembler, linker and binary
> utilitils
OK, those are the current versions for woody. (Ass
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 21:53:15 -0400, Kapil Khosla wrote:
> I did an apt-get install g++-2.95 and am having problems using my C++
> compiler.
Are you running testing or unstable? What is the version number of the
g++-2.95 you installed ("dpkg -l g++-2.95")?
> I get the error message
> as: unre
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 16:05:08 +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> for OpenOffice.org I need libstlport4.5-4.5.3 compiled with gcc-3.1,
> because of switching the buildprozess to gcc-3.1 for OpenOffice.org.
>
> But it seems, that the std.includes were not found, I got errors like
> this:
> g++-3.1
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 13:57:24 -0500, David Starner wrote:
> Will someone please take responsibility for this [EMAIL PROTECTED]@# bug!
The localepurge maintainer has taken responsibility for this problem by
extending it's description with the following note:
: Please note, that this tool is a ha
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 09:51:37 +0800, Yingrui Chen wrote:
> which package missing?
"libc6-dev", as you have ignored the "Recommends: libc-dev" dependency of
the "gcc" package.
HTH,
Ray
--
Brought to you by Microsoft .NOT technology: just say No.
severity 135305 normal
reassign 135305 ftp.debian.org
retitle 135305 Please remove "gcc" source package and associated -doc binary
packages from testing
thanks
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 11:16:13 +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> So I guess the right thing to do would be to reassig
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:57:53 +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> The real bug seems to be that gcc-doc, g77-doc, gpc-doc and cpp-doc are
> still available in testing - AFAICT the should be removed from testing.
> (The problem does not occur with sid, as these packages are no longer
&g
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 04:48:03 +0100, Erik Warendorph wrote:
> # apt-get -uyds install gcc-doc
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> g++ g++-2.95 gcc gcc-2.95 libstdc++2.10-dev task-c++-dev
> The following NEW
[Please do not use HTML in email. This is email, not the web]
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 16:57:10 +1300, Etienne Le Sueur wrote:
> I have recently tried to install g++, using dpkg. When I do so, dpkg
> reports a dependancy problem with libstdc++-dev.
>
> Ok, now when I go to install libstdc++-dev t
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 23:38:00 +0100, Michal Kolesar wrote:
> There is a problem with HW?
Not necessarily. It may be a problem with the way the hardware is
configured, or with the drivers you're using and there is still a small
chance it really is a problem in gcc.
> Or in gcc?
I doubt it. If
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 18:16:14 +0100, Michal Kolesar wrote:
> I have installed debian woody.
> I have problems with compiling on my ATHLON 1.2GHz machine.
> (motherboard - Abit KG7)
There are known problems with Athlons running Linux - see
http://www.gentoo.org/
> What can I do for corr
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 23:34:20 -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/programming$ g++ -V 3.0.2 hello.cpp
Do "g++-3.0 hello.cpp" instead.
HTH,
Ray
--
Brought to you by Microsoft .NOT technology: just say No.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 17:47:57 +0300, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:04:59PM +0100, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> > I would recommend to download an old binary, say from SLS 1.0 or so.
> Ok, but what's SLS?
The Softlanding Linux System, a distribution whose 1.03 contained so
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 15:59:04 +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> [15:50:23 tmp]$ g++-3.0 -Wall -ggdb -o main main.cc
> main.cc:1:20: hash_map: No such file or directory
> [15:50:27 tmp]$ wc /usr/include/g++-3/hash_map
Add a '-v' to your command line, and you'll see that that directory isn't
searched:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 16:26:47 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So, do you want to take care of sending this to the gcc people, or should I?
I think it's probably best to wait with forwarding until Matthias or Martin
have had a chance to look at this.
Ray
--
UNIX is not so much a product as i
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 13:57:03 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't know if this is just a problem in the Debian build, or in g++ in
> general
It appears to be a problem with g++ in general. g++-3.0 from the g++-3.0
package (version 3.0.2-3) also fails on it:
zensunni ray 14:06 /tmp
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 17:54:14 +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> In the current case, the compiler does not even give a warning message
> by default. Giving an error message might break valid C++ code (which
> I'm not sure of) but it seems that when you specify -Wall
-Wreturn-type suffices.
>
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 03:51:31 +0100, Sverker Nilsson wrote:
> I had to force installation of one of libstdc++2.10-dev and g++
> 1:2.95.2-13 because they depend on each other.
Force is not necessary, just install both in one dpkg command line, and dpkg
will do fine.
Ray
--
LEADERSHIP A form o
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:16:34 -0400, Richard Reich wrote:
> I'm trying to build gcc on my home box, I did apt-get source gcc and also
> got a few others, I also did apt-get build-dep gcc. I'm still getting an
> error.
> /smb/gcc_bench/gcc2.95.4/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds5/src-native/libobjc/gc.c:37:
43 matches
Mail list logo
