Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-10-27 Thread Ian Jackson
Helmut Grohne writes ("Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building"): > Since it is my interest to not cause more work on Matthias, I will try > to summarize his POV. Thanks. > The most obvious bug is the one mentioned in the patch: #760770 > It is about a bug in the i

Bug#747345: impliedness of -Wunused-parameter depends on -W option ordering

2014-05-07 Thread Ian Jackson
Package: gcc-4.8 Version: 4.8.2-21 Whether various combinations of options imply -Wunused-parameter in the presence of -Wno-unused depends on where on the command line -Wno-unused appears: sid$ cat tt.c void foo(int x) { } sid$ gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-unused -W -c tt.c sid$ gcc -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wn

Bug#664194: gcc exits successfully when given some unknown options!

2012-03-16 Thread Ian Jackson
Package: gcc-4.4 Version: 4.4.5-8 $ /usr/bin/gcc-4.4 -c -pdie-you-bastard -x c /dev/null gcc-4.4: unrecognized option '-pdie-you-bastard' $ echo $? 0 $ Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Ben Hutchings writes ("Increasing minimum 'i386' processor"): > The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are: > 1. All x86 processors with names including '486' I'm still running the machine below, and it would be irritating to have to replace it. Perhaps a better approach would

Bug#627672: PR 28322 patch is still wrong

2011-05-23 Thread Ian Jackson
Package: gcc-4.3 Version: 4.3.2-1.1 The changelog for gcc-4.3 says: gcc-4.3 (4.3.1-5) unstable; urgency=low * Update to SVN 20080705 from the gcc-4_3-branch. - Fix PR target/36634, wrong-code on powerpc with -msecure-plt. * Fix PR target/35965, PIC + -fstack-protector on arm/arme

Bug#601577: Support for multiple successive format attributes

2010-10-27 Thread Ian Jackson
Package: gcc Version: 4:4.3.2-2 Severity: wishlist (This wishlist bug report should probably go upstream.) Consider the following program: void ha(const char *fmt, ...) __attribute__((format(printf,1,2))); void haha(const char *fmt, const char *fmt2, ...) __attribute__((format(printf,

Bug#499251: gcc -MMD erroneously regards missing #includes as only warnings

2008-09-17 Thread Ian Jackson
Package: cpp-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-21 mariner:~/junk> cat t.c #include int x; mariner:~/junk> gcc-4.1 -c -MD t.c && echo hi t.c:1:25: error: nonexistent.h: No such file or directory mariner:~/junk> gcc-4.1 -c -MMD t.c && echo hi t.c:1:25: warning: nonexistent.h: No such file or directory hi mariner:

Bug#487310: GCC ignores -Wno-strict-aliasing

2008-06-20 Thread Ian Jackson
I have cloned this bug so that I can reassign this clone to GCC See the transcript in the original report. We see this: cc -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -O2 -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -I/usr/include/tcl8.4 -I../base -DTCL_MEM_DEBUG -MMD -o hoo

Bug#428559: collect2 ENOSPC => exit status 1 with no stderr output

2007-06-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.2-9 strace shows what I assume is collect2 trying to write to its fd 2 which I didn't redirect, so presumably the compiler driver did. I actually found this bug on Ubuntu with 4.1.2-9ubuntu2 but I'd be very surprised if it isn't also present in the corresponding Debi

Bug#367657: GCC new warnings and compatibility

2006-05-17 Thread Ian Jackson
Package: gcc Version: 4:4.0.2-2 Summary: GCC should be more tolerant of gcc -Wno-this-is-not-a-recognised-warning as specified in detail below. Discussion: Occasionally, GCC introduces new warnings. For example, GCC 4 has introduced warnings about discrepancies in signedness of integers poi