Bug#785249: gcc-4.9: test suite errors when memory overcommitting is turned off

2015-05-13 Thread Frank Heckenbach
Package: gcc-4.9 Version: 4.9.2-10 Severity: normal When I tried building gcc from sources (debuild -us -uc), I got a number of errors like this: FAIL: g++.dg/asan/interception-malloc-test-1.C -O1 output pattern test, is ==25380==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate 0xdfff0001000 (15392

Bug#593086: See 593110

2011-02-16 Thread Frank Heckenbach
Note the probably related bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593110 That report was removed from the Debian database now because gcc-4.1 (for which is was reported) was removed. Because of this bug (593086), the other issue could not be tested with newer versions, but when this

Bug#593110: gcc-4.1: -MG suppresses error for missing headers

2010-08-15 Thread Frank Heckenbach
Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-21 Severity: normal Tags: upstream *** Please type your report below this line *** When using "-MG", gcc doesn't give an error message, neither exits with nonzero status when included files don't exist, even if not only preprocessing ("-M"), but also when actually

Bug#593086: gcc-4.4: -MG doesn't work with -MD

2010-08-15 Thread Frank Heckenbach
Package: gcc-4.4 Version: 4.4.4-8 Severity: important Tags: upstream *** Please type your report below this line *** % gcc -MD -MG foo.c cc1: error: -MG may only be used with -M or -MM (Contents of source file don't matter.) According to the manual `-MD' is equivalent to `-M -MF FILE', excep

Bug#591914: gcc-4.4: -MD leaves empty .d file on preprocessor error

2010-08-06 Thread Frank Heckenbach
Package: gcc-4.4 Version: 4.4.4-7 Severity: normal Tags: upstream *** Please type your report below this line *** If gcc is invoked with "-MD", and a preprocessor error occurs, an empty dependency file is left. This leads to a problem in the following scenario: - program is compiled OK - a cha

Bug#588087: gcc-4.4: wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements

2010-07-04 Thread Frank Heckenbach
Package: gcc-4.4 Version: 4.4.4-5 Severity: minor *** Please type your report below this line *** For error messages concerning inline assembler statements, gcc counts embedded "\n" characters towards the line number, instead of actual newlines in the source file, so the error messages refer to t

Bug#321395: gpc-2.1-3.3-doc: Broken links to standards.html (forwarded from Stepan Golosunov)

2005-08-09 Thread Frank Heckenbach
fixing external links after generation (automatically with some script or such) ... Frank -- Frank Heckenbach, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fjf.gnu.de/ GnuPG and PGP keys: http://fjf.gnu.de/plan (7977168E) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#232028: Support for a common place for additional units? (forwarded from Torsten Knodt)

2004-02-23 Thread Frank Heckenbach
. also include paths if the units use C wrappers -- not necessary for GRX, but for a number of other libraries) and add them to the global options (which would then be stored somewhere in /etc I guess). I suppose this would be a job for the package maintainers ... Frank -- Frank Heckenbach, [EMAI

Bug#191407: FTBFS: Pascal breaks on (at least) netbsd-i386

2003-04-30 Thread Frank Heckenbach
uot;/tmp/Build/.new/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds5/src/gcc/p/utils/binobj.pas" > > xgpc: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ':' > > xgpc: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ':' > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot open if-exists(crti.o): No such file or directory > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > make[5]: *** [binobj] Error 1 I can't tell anything from this report. With an access, I could try to debug it. If you just want to continue the build, try creating an empty gcc/p/utils/needed-options file in the build directory (but the problem may be deeper, so I don't know the rest will work then). Frank -- Frank Heckenbach, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fjf.gnu.de/ GnuPG and PGP keys: http://fjf.gnu.de/plan (7977168E)

Bug#135727: buffer overflow (?) in writeln

2002-02-25 Thread Frank Heckenbach
ems much easier for the Pascal programmer to write an array if that's what he wants. OTOH, it's easier for the compiler to unroll a loop when optimizing for speed (though actually in this case, it wouldn't be worth it, since the `WriteLn' call overhead is much bigger than the loop iteration). Frank -- Frank Heckenbach, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fjf.gnu.de/ GnuPG and PGP keys: http://fjf.gnu.de/plan (7977168E)

Bug#135730: writeln radix control

2002-02-25 Thread Frank Heckenbach
procedure that takes a format string which describes all the required formatting. So it's similar to C's `printf', but without its inherent type unsafeties. Frank -- Frank Heckenbach, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fjf.gnu.de/ GnuPG and PGP keys: http://fjf.gnu.de/plan (7977168E)