I'm trying to backport gcc 4.7 to squeeze. The missing build dependency I
have is a sufficiently recent binutils. I built 2.22-2 from testing. My
question is whether it is safe to install it on a squeeze machine. Will it
break anything?
Alternatively, is it possible to get around the require
Url is http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24171
Faheem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-3.5
Version: 3.5-0pre1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Justification: Policy 4.2
I tried compiling gcc-3.5 on my system, with the usual
apt-get build-dep ...
and
debuild binary. It crashed towards the end with the following error. This
should be easy to reproduce. As you can
Dear Gcc People,
The following item appears in the changelog.
gcc (2.95.2-16) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control.in: Add awk to Build-Depends.
Tighten libc6-dev dependency for libstdc++-dev (fixes #73031,
#72531, #72534).
I am trying to compile the gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds6) package f
4 matches
Mail list logo