On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 02:26:15AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> is this arm only, or armel as well?
ARM only.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: g++-4.3
Version: 4.3.1-2
Severity: normal
Hello,
the attached code seems to be the minimal test case to reproduce the
current build failure of libept on ARM.
Normally, that code should not do anything, but on ARM, it segfaults.
Ciao,
Enrico
-- System Information:
Debian Release: le
Package: g++-4.3
Version: 4.3.1-2
Severity: normal
Hello,
while trying to investigate why libept does not build on ARM, I came up
with the attached source code. On any system, it gives a link time
error while building it. On ARM, only when invoking g++, only with
-fPIC, it links fine, then runn
l reproducible: that is what would have taken several days.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ing that all the tests pass in the test
case:
DEB_HOST_ARCH := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)
ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),alpha)
ifeq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
DEB_OPT_FLAG = -O1
endif
endif
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL P
Package: g++
Version: 4:4.1.1-11
Severity: normal
Hello,
I'm trying to debug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393194
and I found out that the test suite passes with -O0, -O1 and -O3 but fails
with -O2. g++ is gcc version 4.1.2 20061007 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-16)
g++-4.0 (gcc
rg/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24660
Upstream GCC feature that would solve this problem in an elegant way by
versioning weak symbols in libstdc++.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
o recompile
SCIM with the new gcc and test it from time to time.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-6
Severity: normal
Hello,
Many thanks for packaging gcc!
I found a scenario in which code built with libstdc++5 interacts badly
with code built with libstdc++6, regardless of versioned symbols.
This thread in debian-devel carries the full analysis:
http://list
Package: libgcj3
Version: 1:3.1-2
Severity: normal
Hello,
when installing libgcj3:
Unpacking libgcj3 (from .../libgcj3_1%3a3.1-2_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libgcj3_1%3a3.1-2_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/security/classpath.security', which
10 matches
Mail list logo
