On 2024-11-02 14:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
A lot of the fortran packing, including the module provisions were
suggested and are maintained (?) by other Debian developers, some of
them from the science team. It would make sense to include these
people into the discussions as well.
Thanks Matt
Package: gcc-10
Version: 10.2.0-17
Severity: important
On mipsel, fenicsx-performance-tests 0.0~git20201022.8913e0f-1 has
started failing to build.
The main error is "undefined reference to __divsi3'",
as well as __umodsi3
Excerpt from the build log is:
[ 71%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/dol
An upstream author has asked whether we know of tools or compiler flags
to help catch problems mixing 64 and 32 bit integers, for instance
catching implicit conversions, as in
int64_t n = ...;
for (int32_t i=0; iThere is -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow (which generates a runtime
error m
On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 09:19 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Drew Parsons, on mer. 21 mars 2018 12:44:03 +0800, wrote:
> > The build of PETSc 3.8 triggers an internal compiler error on hurd:
> >
> > CC i386-gnu-complex/obj/src/vec/vec/interface/vector.o
> >
Package: gcc-7
Version: 7.3.0-12
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
The build of PETSc 3.8 triggers an internal compiler error on hurd:
CC i386-gnu-complex/obj/src/vec/vec/interface/vector.o
../../src/init2.c:52: MPFR assertion failed: p >= 2 && p <=
((mpfr_prec_t)((mpfr_uprec_t)(~(mp
> Thanks.
> Jose
>
>
> > El 27 feb 2018, a las 18:18, Drew Parsons
> > escribió:
> >
> > Can anyone make sense of the build error for SLEPc 3.8.2 on i386?
> > ...
> > /<>/slepc-3.8.2+dfsg1/include/slepcmath.h:98:26: note:
Can anyone make sense of the build error for SLEPc 3.8.2 on i386?
The log is at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=slepc&suite=experimental
i.e.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=slepc&arch=i386&ver=3.8.2%2Bdfsg1-1exp1&stamp=1519726001&raw=0
A relevant snippet is
gcc 4.0.2 be likely to
repair it?
One of the users (Felix, cc:d here) is attempting to build Xprt himself
so we'll hear what his success is (he needs a fresh binary to get
unstripped symbols so we can obtain a backtrace from gdb).
Thanks,
Drew Parsons
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Package: gcc
Version: 4:3.3.5-1
Severity: normal
In /use/share/doc/gcc, FAQ.gz and README.bugs are symlinked into ../gcc-3.3,
which no longer exists. It should be ../gcc-3.3-base instead.
This affects all the gcc-defaults packages, not just gcc.
Drew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.1-0pre0
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The latest version of gcc-3.3 (3.3.1-1) cannot be installed. apt complains
as follows:
#apt-get install gcc-3.3
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages wil
s.html> for instructions.
It was working fine a couple of weeks ago with the preceding version of
xprint-xprintorg.
A bug against HPPA's gcc is already listed (#186447), but I'm not sure it's
the same problem that I'm experiencing.
Sincerely,
Drew Parsons
-- System Inform
11 matches
Mail list logo
