proposed text for the freeze policy can be found in
> the following merge request on salsa:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release.debian.org/-/merge_requests/27
My favorite course of action is *not* changing anything regarding d-i
(except the fingerpointing I received afterwards,
more.
Fun you should be reprising that today, I stumbled upon it a few hours
ago while comparing upgraded 10→11 systems vs. fresh 11 systems…
No objections from the d-i side, sorry if that blocked the issue. :/
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D
Matthias Klose (08/05/2012):
> stop blaming the compiler for unrelated build failures. You did so already
> yesterday:
>
> awesome, libchamplain ftbfs with an ICE in gcc-4.7
> yeah for switching the default compiler
> doko: It looks like I'm going to take up your offer. Please fix that.
> dok
Matthias Klose (08/05/2012):
> mbiebl: that might be the gmp10 bug
> KiBi, can't reproduce the libchamplain ICE locally. could you do a
> local build as well?
>
> and I didn't get a reply on that.
Because, if you didn't get the memo, we're trying to get packages built,
which we finally managed
Matthias Klose (07/05/2012):
> see my email to -release. It's ahead of the freeze, and the fix rate for the
> build failures shows that all these issues can be fixed even before the
> freeze. It is not a transition which requires binNMU's itself (except for the
> libobjc stuff), and shouldn't affe
Julien Cristau (07/05/2012):
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* Default to GCC 4.7 for gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386,
> > kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386.
>
> Please revert this ch
Cyril Brulebois (27/03/2011):
> please just contact the appropriate people, pretty please?
And since apparently IRC is the way to answer people and not to mail
the appropriate ones…
05:40:14 [doko__] ping?
05:44:11 [KiBi] pong.
05:44:58 [doko__] I don't care about kfreebsd. debian is
Matthias Klose (27/03/2011):
> On 27.03.2011 04:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Please get in touch with debian-bsd@ if you need help.
>
> please just send a fix.
please just contact the appropriate people, pretty please?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Source: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 (at least):
| /bin/bash ../../src/gcc/../move-if-change tmp-constants.h insn-constants.h
| echo timestamp > s-constants
| gcc -c
Matthias Klose (28/02/2011):
> severity 615827 important
> thanks
For an out-of-date package? I don't think so.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Matthias Klose (28/02/2011):
> wasn't built before.
strictly speaking, yes. But since we're talking about a gcc package,
that *could* be considered as a regression from previous versions… But
what a hairy reasoning!
> It would better help to send a fix.
That's why I put debian-bsd@ in copy…
Ki
Source: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6-20110227-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package no longer builds on powerpc:
| /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile
/build/buildd-gcc-4.6_4.6-20110227-1-powerpc-ayygDJ/gcc-4.6-4.6-20110227/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/build/buildd-gcc-4.6_4.6-20
Source: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6-20110227-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-* with:
| /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile
/build/buildd-gcc-4.6_4.6-20110227-1-kfreebsd-amd64-qdxe8p/gcc-4.6-4.6-2
Hi,
Phil Brooke (12/10/2010):
> Thanks for the reports. It's a known problem with the compiler, not
> topal and adasockets.
yeah, I suspected something like that when I noticed there were
similar-looking bugs. Maybe use a blocked-by as documentation?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Di
Matthias Klose (12/10/2010):
> Version: 4.5.1-8
Alright. Where is that package? I don't see anything in incoming or in
NEW. Not that I care, just curious.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Source: gcj-4.5
Version: 4.5.1-3
Severity: important
Hi,
your package FTBFS on mips*:
| dh_shlibdeps -pgobjc++-4.5-multilib
| dh_gencontrol -pgobjc++-4.5-multilib -- -v4.5.1-3 '-Vgcc:Version=4.5.1-1~'
'-Vgcc:EpochVersion=1:4.5.1-3' '-Vgcc:SoftVersion=4.5.1-1~' '-Vgpc:Version='
'-Vgdc:Version='
Source: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20100918-1
Severity: important
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Hi,
your package no longer builds on alpha:
|
/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100918-1-alpha-P8GOgv/gcc-snapshot-20100918/build/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100918-1-
Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-16
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: sparc
Hi,
your package no longer builds on sparc:
| /bin/bash ../../../../src/libgcc/../mkinstalldirs 64
| mkdir -p -- 64
| /build/buildd-gcc-4.4_4.4.4-16-sparc-k3JHWO/gcc-4.4-4.
Source: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20100918-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: sparc
Hi,
your package no longer builds on sparc:
| Comparing stages 2 and 3
| warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
| warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
| warni
Source: gcc-4.5
Version: 4.5.0-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: sparc
Hi,
your package no longer builds on sparc:
| dh_makeshlibs -plib64stdc++6
| dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see
diff output below
Source: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20100310-1
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64:
|
/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100310-1-kfreebsd-amd64-a9CHgL/gcc-snapshot-20100310/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100310
Source: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20100310-1
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386, apparently right after the
libgfortran part:
| libtool: link: ranlib .libs/libgfortran.a
| libtool: link: ( cd ".libs" && rm -f "libgfortran.l
Source: gdc-4.3
Version: 1:1.043-4.3.4-1
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-*, apparently due to this first error:
|
/build/buildd-gdc-4.3_1.043-4.3.4-1-kfreebsd-i386-zghdOv/gdc-4.3-1.043-4.3.4/build/./gcc/gdc
-B/build/bu
Matthias Klose (11/01/2010):
> I'll go through the list of build failures this week, trying to file
> appropriate bug reports for GCC or the distribution. Please let me
> know if somebody wants to work on this list as well.
Hi,
I might want to join this kind of effort for next runs: I might have
notfixed 560093 1.91
thanks
Debian Bug Tracking System (09/12/2009):
> Version: 1.91
>
> java-gcj-compat-dev now provides gjdoc and includes dh_javadoc.
1.91 would be the latest gcc-defaults version. Let's forget about this
version since java-gcj-compat-dev comes from its own java-gcj-compat
sou
Package: brltty
Version: 4.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package FTBFS on some archs because java-gcj-compat-dev can't be
installed:
| java-gcj-compat-dev: Depends: java-gcj-compat (= 1.0.80-5.1)
|Depends: gcj but it is not going to be installed
| E
Cyril Brulebois (06/07/2009):
> The trivial fix is attached. Fixing this bug ASAP would help
> kfreebsd-i386 get some java support (unfortunately, this package
> wasn't built when dpkg-dev was less strict because of a missing build
> dependency).
Thanks for the ACK. Final debdif
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.80-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
dpkg-dev now expects proper folding in (Build-|)Depends, so your package
now FTBFS:
| dpkg-checkbuilddeps: warning: can't parse dependency gcj-4.3 (>= 4.3.3)
[!hppa]
| ecj (>= 3.3.0)
| dpkg-checkbu
ain.)
Putting [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the loop, it looks like the chroots might need to
be upgraded.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
29 matches
Mail list logo
