Bug#479950: still present in 1.0.78-2

2008-07-28 Thread Blars Blarson
reopen 479950 notfixed 479950 1.0.78-2 thanks Upgrading my system to current sid overwrote my java alternative again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#479950: java-gcj: java alternative overwritten

2008-05-07 Thread Blars Blarson
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > After upgrading my system, a java program failed to run because the java > > alternative was overwritten from the previously selected sun java. > > maybe this works for the simple case, but how is it technically > possible to keep

Bug#479950: java-gcj: java alternative overwritten

2008-05-07 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: java-gcj-compat Version: 1.0.78-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 *** Please type your report below this line *** After upgrading my system, a java program failed to run because the java alternative was overwritten from the previously selected sun java. -- System Informat

Bug#365900: priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1

2006-05-03 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: libgnatprj4.1 Version: 4.1.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.5 priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1. I don't think ada or ada libraries should be priority standard. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable AP

Bug#360776: libstdc++ test packages

2006-04-09 Thread Blars Blarson
= 4.1.0-2); however: Version of gcc-4.1-base on system is 4.1.0-1. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#341877: gcc-3.4: ftbfs [sparc] error: conflicting types for 'malloc'

2005-12-03 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: gcc-3.4 Version: 3.4.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source gcc-3.4 failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. if [ x"`case '-O2 -g -O2 -m64 -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -fno-implicit-templates -m64' in *-fpic* ) echo -fpic ;; * ) echo -fPI

Bug#341189: gcc-snapshot: ftbfs [sparc] cannot compute sizeof (int)

2005-11-28 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20051124-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source gcc-snapshot still fails to buid from source on sparc. Now the error is: checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes checking for int... yes checking size of int... configure: error: cannot compute

Bug#340687: gcc-snapshot: ftbfs [sparc] error: cannot run C compiled programs.

2005-11-25 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20051122-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source gcc-snapshot failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. Running configure in multilib subdirs 64 pwd: /build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20051122/build/sparc-linux-gnu/libiber

Bug#339703: gcc-2.95: ftbfs [sparc] 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/obstack.h.r

2005-11-17 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.4-23 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source gcc-2.95 failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. if [ -x debian/patches/sparc-gcc4-fix.dpatch ]; then true; else chmod +x debian/patches/sparc-gcc4-fix.dpatch; fi if

Fixed in NMU of gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds15-22.1

2005-10-28 Thread Blars Blarson
Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers Changed-By: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: chill-2.95 - The GNU CHILL compiler cpp-2.95 - The GNU C preprocessor cpp-2.95-doc - Documentation for the GNU C preprocessor (cpp) g++-2.95 - The GNU C++ co

Bug#323512: NMU patch

2005-10-28 Thread Blars Blarson
package gcc-2.95 tags 326506 + patch thanks Attached is the NMU patch to fix these ftbfs bugs. It builds on sparc, I'll test the build on i386 before uploading. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Micr

Bug#330101: gcc-4.0: ftbfs [sparc] make[2]: *** No rule to make target `current_symbols.txt'

2005-09-25 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-9 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source gcc-4.0 failed to build on a sparc buildd, but succeeded on my sparc pbuilder. Possible reasons for this include timestamp scew, more recent kernel version on my pbuilder, and more recent build-dependanc

Bug#326506: gcc-2.95: ftbfs [sparc] reorg.c:384: error: invalid lvalue in increment

2005-09-03 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.4-22 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source gcc-2.95 fails to build in a current sparc sid pbuilder chroot. It looks like it may be using gcc-4.0 to compile code that isn't clean enough for gcc-4.0. cc -c -DIN_GCC -DHAIFA-g -DHAVE_CO

Bug#321215: g++-4.0: [sparc] internal compiler error: in invert_exp_1, at jump.c:1719

2005-08-03 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: g++-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-2 Severity: important mysql-dfsg-4.1 fails to build on sparc due to a g++ interinal compiler error: if g++ -DMYSQL_SERVER -DDEFAULT_MYSQL_HOME="\"/usr\"" -DDATADIR="\"/var/lib/mysql\"" -DSHAREDIR="\"/usr/share/mysql\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../innobase/

Bug#315502: gcc-3.3: [sparc] gcc -m64 fails to link binaries

2005-06-27 Thread Blars Blarson
tainer cced.) The -V problem may just be an unrelated error anyway. The main error was in the later use of gcc to link programs, which failed on building both strace and ncurses. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.htm

Bug#315502: gcc-3.3: [sparc] gcc -m64 fails to link binaries

2005-06-22 Thread Blars Blarson
linker and bina ii cpp-3.3 1:3.3.5-13 The GNU C preprocessor ii gcc-3.3-base1:3.3.5-13 The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.0-9

Bug#307625: gcc-3.4 sparc build succeeded

2005-05-05 Thread Blars Blarson
After upgrading the kernel on my sparc pbuilder to 2.6.8-6, (sarge version) I retried the build and it succeeded. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard

Bug#307750: gcc-3.3: ftbfs [sparc] Segmentation fault ./binobj --help 2>/dev/null

2005-05-05 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.6-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source gcc-3.3 fails to build from source on sparc, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. (With the segmenetation fault line having 16604 rather than 23793 on it.) if grep '^[^-]' "needed-options" > /d

Bug#307625: gcc-3.4: ftbfs [sparc] ldd on `debian/lib64gcc1/lib64/libgcc_s.so.1' gave error exit status 1

2005-05-04 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: gcc-3.4 Version: 3.4.3-12.1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source gcc-3.4 failed to build from source on the sparc buildd. The ldd error looks like it may be a known kernel bug fixed in current sarge kernels on sparc, but not yet on vore. dh_shlibdeps -

Bug#298023: gcc-snapshot: ftbfs [sparc] cannot find -l-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk

2005-03-03 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20050227-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source gcc-snapshot fails to build from source, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. /gcc-snapshot/sparc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/sparc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/s

sparc builds need to be requeued

2004-12-07 Thread Blars Blarson
dependancy stage. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.

gcc-snapshot sparc build

2004-12-03 Thread Blars Blarson
ics/complex/13450.cc execution test FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/complex_value.cc execution test FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/pow.cc execution test make[1]: *** [stamps/06-check-stamp] Terminated -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.

Bug#214694: gcc-3.3 should conflict with g++-3.3 (<< 3.3.2)

2003-10-08 Thread Blars Blarson
Unless I'm totally misreading the bug, the problem is gcc needs to conflict with g++ versions that are incompatable with it. Shouldn't this be reopened and reassigned to gcc? -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/

Bug#196505: g++-3.2: /usr/share/man/man1/i386-linux-g++-3.2.1 is a dangling symlink

2003-06-07 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: g++-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-4 Severity: minor Tags: sid After deleting the g++-3.3 dangling symlink, I'm getting: /etc/cron.daily/man-db: mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/i386-linux-g++-3.2.1 is a dangling symlink -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i3

Bug#135651: libstdc++2.10-dev: upgrade fails "version GLIBC_2.2 not found

2002-02-25 Thread Blars Blarson
> .../libdb2_2%3a2.7.7.0-3.1_i386.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement libdb2 ... > Replacing files in old package libc6 ... > > I suggest you try reassigning the bug to libdb2. > > p. > The other lines wern't errors, and if you require the pack

Bug#135651: libstdc++2.10-dev: upgrade fails "version GLIBC_2.2 not found

2002-02-25 Thread Blars Blarson
bc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2' not found (required by > > /lib/libdb.so.3) > > This is NOT the first bug, why does perl print the error message? You are welcome to look through the logs in http://www.blars.org/obfucsate/ and find an earlier falure to blame if you can