Bug#319553: g++-4.0: HUGE_VAL causes error with -pedantic

2005-07-22 Thread Ben Burton
Package: g++-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-2 Severity: normal Hi, I've run into a build failure whilst transitioning one of my packages to g++-4.0. The error occurs when HUGE_VAL is used with -pedantic in C++ code, as in the following program: #include int main() { double d = 1.0; if (d

Bug#210716: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jython causes kaffe to fail with assert error

2005-07-10 Thread Ben Burton
Hi, > we cannot reasonably do anything about this bug without more info, and > there's been no feedback for 3 month, so I close it. Well, 1.5 months actually. But yeah, I probably wouldn't have made it back to you after 3 months anyway. :/ Just rebuilt jython with gcj-3.3, and it seems to run

Bug#210716: jython causes kaffe to fail with assert error

2004-02-02 Thread Ben Burton
> well, I still could reenable building gij-3.2 / gcj-3.2, if that's > necessary for the sarge release. I don't have any reason to believe that this bug is new to gcj-3.3 - the only reason it wasn't spotted until now was kaffe+jython used to be broken for other reasons. So it's entirely possible

Bug#210716: jython causes kaffe to fail with assert error

2004-02-01 Thread Ben Burton
Hi. > Ben, please could you update the status regarding newer gcj-3.3 / > gcc-snapshot packages? Still broken with both gcj 4:3.3.2-2 and gcc-snapshot 20040118-1. Ben.

Bug#210716: jython causes kaffe to fail with assert error

2004-01-31 Thread Ben Burton
> Ben, please could you update the status regarding newer gcj-3.3 / > gcc-snapshot packages? Yep, sorry - got quite a bit busy these last few weeks. I will get to it. b.

Bug#210716: jython causes kaffe to fail with assert error

2004-01-03 Thread Ben Burton
Hi. > please could you provide a reduced testcase and/or name the file > beeing miscompiled? This might or might not be an easy thing, and I'm about to leave for two weeks where I will quite probably be down to email and nothing more. So I can do this but it might be some time. > what's the st

Re: gcc3.3 + blackdown java + dynamic_cast == crash

2003-06-11 Thread Ben Burton
> Nevertheless it's the libstdc++ issue. Your code works fine with our > gcc-3.2 build of 1.4.1. Rightio, so it seems the debian j2se1.4 package does need a rebuild then. Thanks - Ben. :)

Re: gcc3.3 + blackdown java + dynamic_cast == crash

2003-06-11 Thread Ben Burton
> If you use a C++ dynamic_cast complied with g++-3.3 within a native Java > method, the blackdown JVM (1.4.1) crashes. Btw, further investigation suggests that this problem might be fixed by rebuilding the blackdown JVM with gcc-3.3. Stephen, would this be possible? Thanks - Ben. :)

gcc3.3 + blackdown java + dynamic_cast == crash

2003-06-11 Thread Ben Burton
Hi. I've just been converting an app to use C++-style casts instead of C-style casts and I've come across a nasty problem. If you use a C++ dynamic_cast complied with g++-3.3 within a native Java method, the blackdown JVM (1.4.1) crashes. I've attached three very short sample files that illus

Bug#180567: gij-3.2: Broken zip file handling

2003-02-11 Thread Ben Burton
Package: gij-3.2 Severity: normal Hi. From what I can tell, zip file handling under gij-3.2 seems to be broken. I have a transcript of a session below that shows a simple Java program involving zip files that breaks under gij-3.2. This interests me particularly, since Jython currently has a gr

Bug#167014: gij/gcj wrapper scripts

2003-01-27 Thread Ben Burton
Okay, sorry this has taken so long. I've put a gij-wrapper-3.2 and a gcj-wrapper-3.2 up on http://people.debian.org/~bab/java if you want to take a look. I've done some basic testing and everything seems to be in order, but I wouldn't mind doing a little more testing with some of the more comple

Bug#176629: gij-3.2: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime

2003-01-14 Thread Ben Burton
> > According to the Java policy, packages that provide java1-runtime must > > support the the complete java runtime environment. Well, AFAICT (looking at policy linked to www.debian.org), the Java policy isn't particularly explicit. Section 2.1 states: Java virtual machines must provide java

Re: Bug#171123: g++-3.2: incorrect use of default assignment operator?

2002-11-29 Thread Ben Burton
Hmm, okay, my bad. I'm reading through 12.8 now and it seems the implicit copy constructor is always available, not just when no other constructors are defined as I had thought. If you agree with this then please go ahead and close this bug. Thanks - Ben.

Re: Bug#171123: g++-3.2: incorrect use of default assignment operator?

2002-11-29 Thread Ben Burton
> > I would have expected a compile error, since the declaration > > "Foo bar = foo;" tries to use the non-existant default constructor for > > class Foo. > > No, it doesn't. This is not a initialization followed by an assignment > operator; there is no assignment operator at all in this statement

Bug#171123: g++-3.2: incorrect use of default assignment operator?

2002-11-28 Thread Ben Burton
Package: g++-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.1-1 Severity: normal Hi. Both g++-3.2 and g++-2.95 seem to have problems with the following code. #include struct Foo { int val; Foo(int newVal) { val = newVal; } Foo& operator = (const Foo& other) { val = 2;

Bug#167932: Please include /usr/lib/jni in default JNI search path

2002-11-05 Thread Ben Burton
ava/jnifix It merely appends /usr/lib/jni to the JNI search path if it's not already included and passes everything on to the real java runtime. Thanks - Ben. -- Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] I go into a real vulnerable side of

Bug#167014: gcj-3.2: Wrapper script cannot handle paths with spaces

2002-10-29 Thread Ben Burton
Package: gcj-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre4 Severity: normal Hi. The gcj-wrapper-3.2 script currently cannot handle paths containing spaces. As an example, create subdirectory "foo bar" containing Test.java. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp> gcj-wrapper-3.2 foo\ bar/Test.java gcj-3.2: cannot specify -o with

Bug#163172: gcj-3.2: Wrapper will not compile some files with path information

2002-10-03 Thread Ben Burton
Package: gcj-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre3 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi. The wrapper /usr/bin/gcj-wrapper-3.2 fails if the first source it is given contains path information beginning with a period. Example: gcj-wrapper-3.2 ../src/Test.java This is because such a source is not recognised as

Bug#160859: gcj-3.2: Wrapper will not compile some files

2002-09-14 Thread Ben Burton
Package: gcj-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi. The script gcj-wrapper-3.2 will not compile java files whose names begin with an underscore. I'm specifically encountering this problem in trying to modify the jython build to use gcj. The patch is simple (and has been tes

Bug#150142: Patch for gcj -classpath problem

2002-06-17 Thread Ben Burton
tags 150142 + patch thanks Hi. Below is a small patch that seems to fix the problem. --- /usr/bin/gcj-wrapper-3.1Tue Jun 4 01:21:17 2002 +++ gcj-wrapper-3.1 Mon Jun 17 18:20:27 2002 @@ -11,7 +11,12 @@ fi case "$arg" in --classpath|-encoding|-bootclasspath|-extdirs) +

Bug#150142: gcj-3.1: gcj-wrapper-3.1 problem with -classpath

2002-06-16 Thread Ben Burton
Package: gcj-3.1 Version: 1:3.1.1-0pre2 Severity: normal Hi. The script gcj-wrapper-3.1 claims to translate javac options to gcj options (at least according to its manpage). However, the option -classpath is passed to gcj unchanged at which point gcj-3.1 fails to recognise it (although gcj-3.0 r

Bug#148725: gij-3.1, java-runtime2 and libbtools-java

2002-06-16 Thread Ben Burton
gt; 1.2 (for example Swing is missing and AWT is incomplete). It's primarily the requirement on javax.swing that forces libbtools-java to depend on java2-runtime. Ben. -- Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://baasil.humbug.org.au/bab/ Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#141902: gcj-3.0: default constructor for inner class causes broken bytecode

2002-04-08 Thread Ben Burton
Package: gcj-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.4-6 Severity: normal Hi. I have the following piece of code that compiles correctly but then gives an error when run. It involves calling a default constructor for an inner class. If gcj won't accept this default constructor, it should give a compile error. If g

Bug#141900: gcj-3.0: compile breaks using temporary inner class instance

2002-04-08 Thread Ben Burton
Package: gcj Version: 2:3.0.4-5 Severity: normal Hi. I'm getting a gcj compile error when calling a member function of a newly created instance of an inner class. Try compiling the following chunk of code: class Test { public static void main(String[] args) { (new InnerTest())

Bug#141899: gcj-3.0: locks up during .java->.class compilation

2002-04-08 Thread Ben Burton
Package: gcj-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.4-6 Severity: normal Hi. I have a java file that causes gcj to lock up when it tries to compile it to java bytecode. The specific example is in the jython sources; I believe you can reproduce the problem as follows: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/source/debian/made> apt-get

Bug#119384: libgcj2/gij and java1-runtime

2001-11-20 Thread Ben Burton
packages that depend on java-virtual-machine call /usr/bin/java from their startup scripts. Proposed java policy is at: http://people.debian.org/~opal/java/policy.html (and in incoming in package java-common, I believe). Thanks - Ben. -- Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

fastjar: man page

2001-08-19 Thread Ben Burton
tags 103051 +patch thanks Hi.. there is a manpage for fastjar up on the missing manpages project at: http://www.netmeister.org/misc/m2p2/man1/fastjar.1.gz I realise this is right on the heels of the corresponding post to debian-devel, but I'm mentioning this explicitly because I filed #103051 s

Bug#103051: fastjar: Please include man page

2001-07-01 Thread Ben Burton
Package: fastjar Version: 1:3.0-3 Severity: normal Hi. Would it be possible to add a man page for fastjar? Thanks - Ben. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux emerald 2.4.4-686 #1 Sun Apr 29 12:22:40 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Ver