6/lib/libXxf86dga.so is missing atexit, so i suppose
that counts as a debian package problem...
just thought i'd mail a heads up, as it's not critical for me yet, but i recall
having this issue a while back...
Andrew 'ashridah' Pilley
(and yes, i know stictly speaking that this is a
well. looks like it's in incoming.debian.org already. should be appearing in
the next 24 hours.
sweet
wonder if mozilla builds with it... the last time i tried it broke :)
Andrew 'ashridah' Pilley
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:39:24 -0400 (EDT), Christopher C. Chimelis said:
>
>
me a clean bill of health. But, obviously, something is
> wrong.
if you're ever looking for a file, you CAN join the #debian channel on
irc.openprojects.net, and type /msg apt find
it'll usually tell you where the file came from. (it's a bot). don't forget
On Tue, 15 May 2001 11:00:47 -0400 (EDT), Christopher C. Chimelis said:
>
> On 15 May 2001, Andrew 'ashridah' Pilley wrote:
>
> > heh. okay. the topic's ambiguous. i apoligize
> > if you have any comments on this, please read
> > on, it&
at would be usable against 2.96 that are pertinent
to the situation? or is it just not worth the trouble
doing the "stepping stone" approach that redhat are
using by forcing themselves to do the gcc dance again
when 3.0 comes out?
thanks for a) reading b) replying if you DO have comments
c) making debian work :)
Andrew 'ashridah' Pilley
variable to use with
make-kpkg (my preferred method of building the kernel :) )
does anyone know how i'd set that?
thanks
Andrew 'ashridah' Pilley
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:38:05PM +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Bruce Stephens writes:
> > > When compiling today's XEmacs (tag release-21.2), I get the same error
> > > I was getting with gcc-2.95-2.95.3-8:
> >
> > please get -9 or -10 (from i
hey,
i'm not fantastically sure if this is the right place to send this, so feel
free to flame accordingly if you think i'm majorly out of place.
i've recently tried to compile mozilla 0.8.1 a few times (like 10 or so)
on debian sid, and i've run across an interesting bug, of sorts. it compiles
8 matches
Mail list logo
