repository? Would it be possible to stop using
> that outdated embedded copy and use the debian libffi package instead?
The gcc copy of libffi accepts backports.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
&q
On Dez 04 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> So I assume we can strip the patch from the changes in s-memory.adb and
> s-memory.ads?
Yes.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now fo
On Dez 04 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> @Andreas: Are you sure the patch is no longer necessary?
I didn't say that.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for somethi
ding to PR48835, this is no longer necessary.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
iewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=230753>.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Helmut Grohne writes:
> +++ gcc-5-5-20150307/debian/patches/pr52306.diff
PR52306 is FIXED in gcc5.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
T
wrong way to go.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
This is a bug in binutils 2.15 that's already fixed in CVS HEAD.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, MaxfeldstraÃe 5, 90409 NÃrnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something
t;a == %i claims %x\n", a, &a);
|> printf("a == %i really %x\n", (&b)[-1], (&b)-1);
There is nothing in the C standard that requires that (char*)(&b-1) == &a.
They are distinct objects, thus not comparable, and &b-1 by itself is
already invalid.
Andr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ryan Murray) writes:
|> The branch of libtool that supports --tag has been totally untouched
|> in cvs for at least two years.
The multi-language-branch is dead, and has been merged into HEAD nearly
two years ago.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PRO
10 matches
Mail list logo