We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
changes were made to the overrides...
Concerning package gcc-10-base...
Operating on the unstable suite
Changed priority from required to optional
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comm
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
changes were made to the overrides...
Concerning package gcc-12-base...
Operating on the unstable suite
Changed priority from required to optional
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42540
--- Comment #21 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #20)
> No, but "the first non-pure, non-inline virtual function in the class" is
> easy for the user to find.
Well, yes, granted, that would be a huge improvement.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42540
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, but "the first non-pure, non-inline virtual function in the class" is easy
for the user to find.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You reported the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42540
--- Comment #19 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #17)
Ok, have read the wiki page.
> The linker could easily say that, with no changes from GCC.
Is the signature, or name, of the "key function" present in compil
Source: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.194
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: dpkg-root-support
X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org
Hi,
when creating chroots for new architectures that are in the process of
being bootstrapped without yet having emulation support from qe
6 matches
Mail list logo
