Hi Norbert,
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 08:08:20PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > The bug you report is actually present in -1 already.
>
> Hmmm
>
> > The package is not unusable. It merely cannot be coinstalled.
>
> then why on earth did I have both arch (amd64, i386) installed on my
> c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 981924
Bug #981924 [libelf1] trying to overwrite shared
'/usr/share/locale/en@boldquot/LC_MESSAGES/elfutils.mo', which is different
from other instances of package libelf1:i386
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 981924
Bug #981924 {Done: Matthias Klose } [libelf1] trying to
overwrite shared '/usr/share/locale/en@boldquot/LC_MESSAGES/elfutils.mo', which
is different from other instances of package libelf1:i386
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 981924 0.182+20210203-1.1+b1
Bug #981924 [libelf1] trying to overwrite shared
'/usr/share/locale/en@boldquot/LC_MESSAGES/elfutils.mo', which is different
from other instances of package libelf1:i386
Ignoring request to alter found versions
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 11:29:45 +0100
Source: dwz
Architecture: source
Version: 0.13+20210201-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers
Changed-By: Matthias Klose
Changes:
dwz (0.13+20210
Your message dated Sat, 6 Feb 2021 12:08:22 +0100
with message-id <18454058-8a02-d12c-2935-92b20906b...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: elfutils: Support for various arches
has caused the Debian Bug report #384794,
regarding elfutils: Support for various arches.
to be marked as done.
This means t
closing. builds for most linux archs. please open separate bugs for missing
architecture support, also upstreamed bugs and patches.
Hi Helmut,
> The bug you report is actually present in -1 already.
Hmmm
> The package is not unusable. It merely cannot be coinstalled.
then why on earth did I have both arch (amd64, i386) installed on my
computer before? And in addition, downgrading to the versions in testing
did work wi
dwz_0.13+20210201-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
dwz_0.13+20210201-1.dsc
dwz_0.13+20210201.orig.tar.xz
dwz_0.13+20210201-1.debian.tar.xz
dwz_0.13+20210201-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debia
I'm trying to avoid the NEW queue until the bullseye release. But after that,
maybe it's better to spend time to disallow binNMUs altogether?
Your message dated Sat, 6 Feb 2021 11:56:03 +0100
with message-id
and subject line x32 build succeeds
has caused the Debian Bug report #905230,
regarding elfutils: FTBFS on x32 due to bugs in testsuite
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 968670 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27357
Bug #968670 [dwz] dwz: Fails with "Unknown DWARF DW_OP_1"
Bug #976515 [dwz] olive-editor: FTBFS: dh_dwz: error: dwz
-mdebian/olive-editor/usr/lib/debug/.dwz/aarch64-linux-gnu/
12 matches
Mail list logo