* Lucas Nussbaum:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 22/11/20 at 15:32 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
>> Hi Lucas,
>>
>> That looks like an ICE, shouldn't that be filed with gfortran?
>
> Usually my logic is: if there's only one similar failure, I file a bug
> against the affected package, rather than against the
Hi Michael,
On 22/11/20 at 15:32 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> That looks like an ICE, shouldn't that be filed with gfortran?
Usually my logic is: if there's only one similar failure, I file a bug
against the affected package, rather than against the toolchain package
or the librar
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from git: releases/gcc-10.2.0 revision
ee5c3db6c5b2c3332912fb4c9cfa2864569ebd9a
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu
Hi Lucas,
That looks like an ICE, shouldn't that be filed with gfortran?
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:52:05AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > mpif90 `dpkg-buildflags --get FFLAGS` `dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS`
> > -Wall -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fopenmp -fallow-argument-mismatch
> > `dpkg-b
4 matches
Mail list logo