Re: preparing for GCC 9

On 26.10.18 15:49, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 15:02, Matthias Klose wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> stage3 is approaching for GCC 9 development, and I put together a first gcc-9 >> package. I won't upload that to experimental yet because sonames and package >> names will still change, and

Re: preparing for GCC 9

On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 15:02, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Hi, > > stage3 is approaching for GCC 9 development, and I put together a first gcc-9 > package. I won't upload that to experimental yet because sonames and package > names will still change, and gcc-for-host will add a few hundred binary >

gcc-6_6.5.0-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:47:48 +0200 Source: gcc-6 Binary: gcc-6-base libgcc-6-dev libgcc4 libgcc4-dbg lib64gcc-6-dev lib32gcc-6-dev libn32gcc-6-dev libx32gcc-6-dev gcc-6 gcc-6-multilib gcc-6-test-results gcc-6-plugin-dev

Processing of gcc-6_6.5.0-1_source.changes

gcc-6_6.5.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-6_6.5.0-1.dsc gcc-6_6.5.0.orig.tar.gz gcc-6_6.5.0-1.diff.gz gcc-6_6.5.0-1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

preparing for GCC 9

Hi, stage3 is approaching for GCC 9 development, and I put together a first gcc-9 package. I won't upload that to experimental yet because sonames and package names will still change, and gcc-for-host will add a few hundred binary packages as well. So please test/check these in an Ubuntu cosmic

[Bug c/23144] [6/7/8/9 Regression] invalid parameter forward declarations not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23144 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.5 |7.4 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek