Bug#871630: gcc-defaults should ensure equal versions in both directions

2017-08-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: gcc-defaults Severity: important Tags: patch https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lorene&arch=ppc64el&ver=0.0.0~cvs20161116%2Bdfsg-1%2Bb1&stamp=1502276276&raw=0 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=dynare&arch=ppc64el&ver=4.5.1-1%2Bb1&stamp=1502287921&raw=0 https://buil

Processed: Re: Bug#871514: clamav: FTBFS on mips64el

2017-08-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 gcc-7 7.1.0-12 Bug #871514 [clamav] clamav: FTBFS on mips64el Bug reassigned from package 'clamav' to 'gcc-7'. No longer marked as found in versions clamav/0.99.2+dfsg-6. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #871514 to the same values previous

Re: Bug#871514: clamav: FTBFS on mips64el

2017-08-09 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
control: reassign -1 gcc-7 7.1.0-12 control: affects -1 clamav On 2017-08-09 16:43:29 [+0200], Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I got a quick look. It's indeed a regression introduced by GCC 7. It can > be workarounded by building the file with -O0, but already appears with > -O1 optimization. > > I got a

Bug#871538: Makes apparmor FTBFS on mips64el (generated code thinks that 1 > 1)

2017-08-09 Thread intrigeri
Hi mips porters, can you please have a look at #871538? It includes gdb debugging information that seems to demonstrate a regression in the toolchain on mips64el with GCC-7. Cheers, -- intrigeri

Re: Bug#871514: clamav: FTBFS on mips64el

2017-08-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2017-08-08 20:41, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2017-08-08 20:34:37 [+0200], To sub...@bugs.debian.org wrote: > … > > returned (the important part): > > |LibClamAV debug: parseEmailBody() rc 1 infect 0 > > |LibClamAV debug: parseEmailBody() returning 3 > … > > The exp build passed with g

Processed: fixed 858890 in gnat-6/6.4.0-3

2017-08-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 858890 gnat-6/6.4.0-3 Bug #858890 [gnat-6] gnat-6: missing dependency on the gcc package ? The source gnat-6 and version 6.4.0-3 do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as fixed in versions gnat-6/6.4.0-3. > thanks Stopping process

Processed (with 1 error): Re: gnat-6: missing dependency on the gcc package ?

2017-08-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 gnat-6 6.3.0-10 Bug #858890 [gnat] gnat-6: missing dependency on the gcc package ? Bug reassigned from package 'gnat' to 'gnat-6'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #858890 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed v

Processed: affects 871538

2017-08-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 871538 + apparmor Bug #871538 [gcc-7] Makes apparmor FTBFS on mips64el (generated code thinks that 1 > 1) Added indication that 871538 affects apparmor > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 8715