Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 826987 upstream confirmed
Bug #826987 [gcc-6] gcc-6: __builtin_cpu_supports() doesn't work on powerpc
Added tag(s) confirmed and upstream.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
826987: http
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71777
Bug #826987 [gcc-6] gcc-6: __builtin_cpu_supports() doesn't work on powerpc
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71777'.
--
826987: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71777
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:31:24AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> I cannot see the builtin mentionned anywhere other than on the X86 page:
>>
>> X86 (ok):
>> https:
binary:gcc-6-plugin-dev-aarch64-linux-gnu is NEW.
binary:gcc-6-plugin-dev-arm-linux-gnueabi is NEW.
binary:gcc-6-plugin-dev-arm-linux-gnueabihf is NEW.
binary:gcc-6-plugin-dev-mips-linux-gnu is NEW.
binary:gcc-6-plugin-dev-mips64el-linux-gnuabi64 is NEW.
binary:gcc-6-plugin-dev-mipsel-linux-gnu is
gcc-6-cross_12_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-6-cross_12.dsc
gcc-6-cross_12.tar.xz
cpp-6-aarch64-linux-gnu_6.1.1-9cross1_amd64.deb
cpp-6-arm-linux-gnueabi_6.1.1-9cross1_amd64.deb
cpp-6-arm-linux-gnueabihf_6.1.1-9cross1_amd64.deb
cpp-6-mips-lin
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:31:24AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I cannot see the builtin mentionned anywhere other than on the X86 page:
>
> X86 (ok):
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-6.1.0/gcc/x86-Built-in-Functions.html#index-g_t_005f_005fbuiltin_005fcpu_005finit-4335
>
> PowerPC (noth
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 12 04:22:39 UTC 2016 (revision 237336)
Native configuration is aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== boehm-gc tests ===
Running target unix
=== boehm-gc Summary ===
# of expected passes12
# of unsupported tests 1
debug symbols)
Closes: 809509
Changes:
gcc-6 (6.1.1-9) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Update to SVN 20160705 (r237999, 6.1.1) from the gcc-6-branch.
- Fix PR fortran/71717, PR libstdc++/71313, PR c/71685, PR c++/71739,
PR target/71670 (PPC), PR middle-end/71626, PR target/71559 (x86
UBSan -- undefined behaviour sanitizer (x32 debug symbols)
Closes: 809509
Changes:
gcc-6 (6.1.1-9) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Update to SVN 20160705 (r237999, 6.1.1) from the gcc-6-branch.
- Fix PR fortran/71717, PR libstdc++/71313, PR c/71685, PR c++/71739,
PR target/71670 (PPC), PR m
gcc-6_6.1.1-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-6_6.1.1-9.dsc
gcc-6_6.1.1-9.diff.gz
gcc-6-locales_6.1.1-9_all.deb
gcc-6-source_6.1.1-9_all.deb
gcj-6-jre-lib_6.1.1-9_all.deb
gcj-6-source_6.1.1-9_all.deb
libgccjit-6-doc_6.1.1-9_all.deb
libgcj-d
I might add that clan++ shows the same behavior, I've just filed a bug
with llvm upstream [1].
Some more details:
If the enum is replaced by a struct then compilation fails in both, in
c++03 and in c++11 mode.
I suspect now that it is assumed to be permissible by the standard that
white space
Sync Solutions: tot 50% goedkoper dan een Proximus abonnement
GRATIS installatie + GRATIS bellen gedurende 5 jaren
Ontdek onze nieuwe Unify telefooncentrale, gebruiksvriendelijk en remote
management voor de gebruiker.
Ontvang gratis uw offerte:
http://www.kapamedia.eu/sync-solutions-49/form.
12 matches
Mail list logo