Results for 4.8.1 (Debian 4.8.1-8) testsuite on mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu

2013-07-26 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Jul 17 12:30:46 UTC 2013 (revision 200995) Target: mipsel-linux-gnu gcc version 4.8.1 (Debian 4.8.1-8) Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix === g++ Summary for unix === # of expected passes

Bug#717557: gcc-4.8: can't compile working 64bit kernel with 32bit userspace gcc-4.8

2013-07-26 Thread Zlatko Calusic
Actually, I now see that when gcc-4.8 is downgraded to 4.8.1-2, the gcc package gets downgraded to 4.7.2-1. So probaby all gcc-4.8 version have the problem. Last i386 gcc version that successfully compiles 64bit kernel is: gcc version 4.7.3 (Debian 4.7.3-5) -- Zlatko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Location for Fortran90 module files

2013-07-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Matthias, On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:55:18PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 26.07.2013 15:35, schrieb Andreas Tille: > > BTW, it would have been perceived even without the unfriendly tenor. In > > case you might not know the team is maintaining a wide range of packages > > and so there is n

Re: Location for Fortran90 module files

2013-07-26 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 26.07.2013 15:35, schrieb Andreas Tille: > BTW, it would have been perceived even without the unfriendly tenor. In > case you might not know the team is maintaining a wide range of packages > and so there is not always a need to know about specific Fortran issues. well, apparently you did perc

Re: Location for Fortran90 module files

2013-07-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Matthias, On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 02:37:15PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 25.07.2013 14:25, schrieb Michael Banck: > > What to do about the compatibilty is a different matter, did this come > > up before? > > looks like one hand in the debian-science team doesn't know what the other > ha

Re: Location for Fortran90 module files

2013-07-26 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 25.07.2013 14:25, schrieb Michael Banck: > What to do about the compatibilty is a different matter, did this come > up before? looks like one hand in the debian-science team doesn't know what the other hands are doing ... See #714730, even on the debian-science ML. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email