On Mon, 16 May 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I think any claim that Debian supports 486-class processors is more of
> an aspiration. What maintainer has the time to test on such antiques
> regularly?
Well, nobody is running regular kernel regression testing on 486-class
hardware AFAIK, and that in
Package: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6.0-2
Severity: normal
I get the following error:
ay:~> gcc-4.4 tst.c -o tst -mabi=ieeelongdouble
cc1: warning: Using IEEE extended precision long double
/tmp/cceTQS0o.o: In function `main':
tst.c:(.text+0x84): undefined reference to `_q_add'
collect2: ld returned 1 ex
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 21:48 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 15 May 2011, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 May 2011, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > I'm wondering. Is the project at large aware that we're not building for
> > > i486, but for i586 ? That even the maintainer doesn't
On Sunday 15 May 2011, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 15 May 2011, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 May 2011, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > I'm wondering. Is the project at large aware that we're not building
> > > for i486, but for i586 ? That even the maintainer doesn't know why for
On Sun, 15 May 2011, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 15 May 2011, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I'm wondering. Is the project at large aware that we're not building for
> > i486, but for i586 ? That even the maintainer doesn't know why for
>
> No. And unless we got a bug report form an i486
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 14:08:00 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I'm wondering. Is the project at large aware that we're not building for
> i486, but for i586 ? That even the maintainer doesn't know why for
> sure[1] and that no changelog entry documents when or why that happened?
> (nothing in debian
On Sun, 15 May 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 09:28 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 May 2011, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > I just found out that gcc is compiled with --with-arch-32=i586, which
> > > effectively means it builds with -march=i586 by default (an
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 09:28 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 15 May 2011, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I just found out that gcc is compiled with --with-arch-32=i586, which
> > effectively means it builds with -march=i586 by default (and that it
> > still claims an i486-linux-gnu targe
On Sun, 15 May 2011, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I just found out that gcc is compiled with --with-arch-32=i586, which
> effectively means it builds with -march=i586 by default (and that it
> still claims an i486-linux-gnu target).
>
> I'm wondering. Is the project at large aware that we're not building
Hi,
I just found out that gcc is compiled with --with-arch-32=i586, which
effectively means it builds with -march=i586 by default (and that it
still claims an i486-linux-gnu target).
I'm wondering. Is the project at large aware that we're not building for
i486, but for i586 ? That even the mainta
10 matches
Mail list logo
