On 18.11.2010 21:54, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.5-8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
This is the patch used right now for the armhf port of gcc-4.4. It works
against 4.4.5-8, and contrary to the first versions it's very short -no
extra linaro patches are necessary
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Don Armstrong wrote:
> >There are a couple of things here that should be worked out first
> >before the CTTE can make a decision:
>
> I assume that there is a decision to turn on hardening defaults?
No one has decided anything. I'm
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Nov 14 07:41:30 UTC 2010 (revision 166728)
Target: mipsel-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.5.1 (Debian 4.5.1-11)
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/packed1.C (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: attri
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Oct 16 11:48:27 UTC 2010 (revision 165538)
Target: hppa-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.6.0 20101016 (experimental) [trunk revision 165538] (Debian
20101016-1)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2321
# of unexpect
On 21.11.2010 08:39, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
CCing Kees Cook, he has been the one leading the efforts up to now. I hope
he can answer your queries.
Hi,
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Don Armstrong wrote:
There are a couple of things here that should be worked out first
before the CTTE can make a decision
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I assume that there is a decision to turn on hardening defaults?
> Who made it, and which defaults to turn on? Which ports should it
> use? Where is it documented? So involvement of the ctte seems to
> be a bit premature, asking the *how* before
6 matches
Mail list logo
