severity 558999 important
thanks
On 27.07.2010 18:30, Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi,
maybe we should try gcc -mlong-calls on java-gnome and/or gtk+?
I can do as soon as I have access to my own machine where I have a key
to the Debian hppa porter box.
I confirm that that adding -mlong-calls to CFL
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 558999 important
Bug #558999 [gcc-4.4] FTBFS [hppa] - recompile with -ffunction-sections
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
558999: http://bugs.deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 589459 gcj-4.4
Bug #589459 [gcj-jdk] vtk: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error:
'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Bug reassigned from package 'gcj-jdk' to 'gcj-4.4'.
> tag 589459 + pending
Bug #589459 [gcj-4.4] vtk: FTBFS on kfreebs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # All these bugs are still present in gcj-4.4 on amd64/sid, so I'm
> # reassigning them there. They're also present in gcc 4.5.
> reassign 506946 gcj-4.4
Bug #506946 {Done: Sandro Tosi } [gij-4.3] gij-4.3:
System.out.printf("%f") doesn't work
Bu
Package: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-7
Severity: wishlist
When cross building the gcc-4.4-4.4.4-7 pacakage, the build no longer
generates a gcc-4.4-*-gnueabi-base package as part of the default build. The
control file, however still references such a package as a dependency for
installing the gcc-4.4-
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_5_0_release revision 158339
Target: i486-kfreebsd-gnu
gcc version 4.5.1 20100725 (prerelease) (Debian 4.5.0-10)
Native configuration is i486-pc-kfreebsd-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for un
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_5_0_release revision 158339
Target: ia64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.5.1 20100725 (prerelease) (Debian 4.5.0-10)
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary ===
#
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_5_0_release revision 158339
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes1624
# of expected failures 10
# of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 516267 gcj-4.4
Bug #516267 {Done: Sandro Tosi } [gcj-4.3] gcj-4.3: number of
processors reported by Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors() is incorrect
Bug reassigned from package 'gcj-4.3' to 'gcj-4.4'.
Bug No longer marked as found
reassign 516267 gcj-4.4
found 516267 4.4.4-6
kthxbye
This is still present in gcj-4.4:
lakeview ok % java numprocs
number of processors: 2
lakeview ok % gij-4.4 numprocs
number of processors: 1
lakeview ok % gij-4.5 numprocs
number of processors: 1
lakeview ok % grep "model name" /
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 590597 gcc-4.5
Bug #590597 [gcj-4.5] gcj-4.1: UTF-16 endianness differs between gcj and Sun JDK
Warning: Unknown package 'gcj-4.5'
Bug reassigned from package 'gcj-4.5' to 'gcc-4.5'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions gcj-4.5/4.5.0
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 386443
Bug #386443 {Done: Sandro Tosi } [gcj-4.3] gcj-4.1: UTF-16
endianness differs between gcj and Sun JDK
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> c
reopen 386443
clone 386443 -1
reassign 386443 gcj-4.4
found 386443 gcj-4.4/4.4.4-6
reassign -1 gcj-4.5
found -1 gcj-4.5/4.5.0-10
kthxbye
I've confirmed this behavior on amd64:
lakeview ok % gij Test | od -tx1
000 ff fe 48 00 65 00 6c 00 6c 00 6f 00 21 00
016
lakeview ok % gij-4.5
The two-liner patch can easilly be applied to gcc-4.4.4 and it seems to work.
It is already included in gcc-4.5 .
--
Marcos Marado
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lis
Hi,
maybe we should try gcc -mlong-calls on java-gnome and/or gtk+?
I can do as soon as I have access to my own machine where I have a key
to the Debian hppa porter box.
bye,
Roland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:30:54 +0400
with message-id
and subject line gnat-4.3 is removed from testing & unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #472979,
regarding gnat-4.3: Depends on Tcl/Tk 8.3 which is subject to removal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:26:43 +0400
with message-id
and subject line gcc-4.2 is removed from testing & unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #472969,
regarding gcc-4.2: Depends on Tcl/Tk 8.3 which is subject to removal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 589459 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40816
Bug #589459 [gcj-jdk] vtk: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error:
'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 589459 gcj-jdk
Bug #589459 [src:vtk] vtk: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error:
'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Bug reassigned from package 'src:vtk' to 'gcj-jdk'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions vtk/5.6.0-2.
> thanks
St
I have updated the patch so that it uses DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to set the
flag to compile the static form of gcc. The option will now be enabled
if the user specifies the option 'static' as one of the
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. This can be done on the command line for
dpkg-buildpackage as follows:
DEB_
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 544884 dpkg
Bug #544884 [libgcc1] E: Internal Error, Could not perform immediate
configuration (2) on libgcc1
Bug reassigned from package 'libgcc1' to 'dpkg'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions gcc-4.4/4.4.1-1.
> thanks
Stopping p
reassign 544884 dpkg
thanks
afaics the error message comes from dpkg. I can't see anything wrong with the
libgcc1 package and cannot reproduce this myself.
On 03.09.2009 16:17, Brice Goglin wrote:
Package: libgcc1
Version: 1:4.4.1-1
Severity: important
$ aptitude reinstall libgcc1 gcc-4.4-ba
Matthias,
Why didn't you close this bug when you upload 4.5.0-10? you have
waited for the buildd to complete successfully (last night) before
closing, is this because you weren't sure you have fixed it and just
upload the package *hoping* it's done? You use this pattern a lot, so
I start to think y
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:08:08 +0200
with message-id <4c4eb008.5020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#590266: gcc-4.5: FTBFS on sparc: symbols issues
has caused the Debian Bug report #590266,
regarding gcc-4.5: FTBFS on sparc: symbols issues
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Accepted:
cpp-4.5_4.5.0-10_s390.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.5/cpp-4.5_4.5.0-10_s390.deb
fixincludes_4.5.0-10_s390.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.5/fixincludes_4.5.0-10_s390.deb
g++-4.5-multilib_4.5.0-10_s390.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.5/g++-4.5-multilib_4.5.0-10_s390.deb
g++-4.5_4.5.0-10_s390.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.
gcc-4.5_4.5.0-10_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.5-base_4.5.0-10_s390.deb
libgcc1_4.5.0-10_s390.deb
libgcc1-dbg_4.5.0-10_s390.deb
lib64gcc1_4.5.0-10_s390.deb
lib64gcc1-dbg_4.5.0-10_s390.deb
libgomp1_4.5.0-10_s390.deb
libgomp1-dbg_4.5.0-10_s3
26 matches
Mail list logo
