Bug#566195: Miscompilation at -O2 on alpha

Greetings! This bug appears fixed in the gcc-snapshot on albeniz. (Don't know how to register this with cont...@b.d.o.) Take care, Falk Hueffner writes: > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 04:35:53PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote: >> > I'd give it a try if I had a standalone executable C test case, i.e. a >>

Bug#580544: cpp-4.3-doc: Remove dependency on gcc-doc-base

Package: cpp-4.3-doc Version: 4.3.4.nf1-1 Severity: normal Tags: sid Looks like gcc-doc-base has been removed from the archive, but the most recent version of cpp-4.3-doc still depends on it. This dependency should be removed. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers un

Bug#580543: gcc-4.3-doc: Remove dependency on gcc-doc-base

Package: gcc-4.3-doc Version: 4.3.4.nf1-1 Severity: normal Tags: sid Looks like gcc-doc-base has been removed from the archive, but the most recent version of gcc-4.3-doc still depends on it. This dependency should be removed. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers un

Bug#566195: Miscompilation at -O2 on alpha

Greetings! Let me see if I can get one for you. Take care, Falk Hueffner writes: > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 04:35:53PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote: >> > I'd give it a try if I had a standalone executable C test case, i.e. a >> > "main()" that demonstrates the problem... >> >> I think Camm attache

Bug#580496: Apparently depends on nonexistent gcc-4.4-doc

Package: gcc-doc deodand:~# apt-get install gcc-doc Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some

Processed: tagging 580148

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 580148 - moreinfo Bug #580148 [gcj-4.4-jdk] gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #580148 to the same tags previously set

Bug#580148: [s390, armel] gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory

retitle 580148 gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory thanks On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 12:53:16PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > I do not have access to those boxes, but IMHO gcj does not find > libgcj.spec because gcj from gcj-4.4-jdk_4.4.4-1 looks for > /usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.4.4/libgcj

Bug#580148: gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory

severity 580148 serious thanks On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:45:25PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:53:18PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:38:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > tag 580148 + moreinfo > > > thanks > > > > Which

Processed: Re: Bug#580148: [s390, armel] gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 580148 gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory Bug #580148 [gcj-4.4-jdk] [s390, armel] gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory Changed Bug title to 'gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory' from '[s390, armel] gcj: libgcj.spe

Bug#580148: [s390, armel] gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory

I do not have access to those boxes, but IMHO gcj does not find libgcj.spec because gcj from gcj-4.4-jdk_4.4.4-1 looks for /usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.4.4/libgcj.spec whereas it ships /usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.4/libgcj.spec, and the 4.4.4 -> 4.4 symlink is provided by gcc-4.4-base_4.4.4-1 but

Processed: Re: Bug#580148: gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 580148 serious Bug #580148 [gcj-4.4-jdk] [s390, armel] gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 580148: http://b