--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 04:44 ---
Subject: Bug 42708
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 7 04:41:22 2010
New Revision: 156562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156562
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline to 4.4.
2010-02-06 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 04:44 ---
Subject: Bug 42703
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 7 04:41:22 2010
New Revision: 156562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156562
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline to 4.4.
2010-02-06 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 04:44 ---
Subject: Bug 42706
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 7 04:41:22 2010
New Revision: 156562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156562
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline to 4.4.
2010-02-06 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 04:43 ---
Subject: Bug 42820
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 7 04:41:22 2010
New Revision: 156562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156562
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline to 4.4.
2010-02-06 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #17 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 04:43 ---
Subject: Bug 42634
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 7 04:41:22 2010
New Revision: 156562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156562
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline to 4.4.
2010-02-06 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 04:43 ---
Subject: Bug 42715
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 7 04:41:22 2010
New Revision: 156562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156562
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline to 4.4.
2010-02-06 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 04:43 ---
Subject: Bug 42713
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 7 04:41:22 2010
New Revision: 156562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156562
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline to 4.4.
2010-02-06 H.J. Lu
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42634
--- You
Dear Sir or Madam:
Is this a bug to remove OpenOffice to install gcj-jre-headless and gij
packages from my old Debian box?
# apt-get install gcj-jre-headless gij
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically i
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Feb 2 18:22:40 UTC 2010 (revision 156452)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -O2 execution test
XPASS: l
--- Comment #5 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-02-06 15:36 ---
Same failures when bootstrapped with binutils-2.20.51.20100202. So there's no
fix on binutils trunk to be identified and backported. I'll try to identify the
point where the regression was introduced instead.
--
http
reopen 552314
thanks
Well, whatever was changed in the latest gcc makes gcc stop
complaining that a branch is out of range. However, the problem is NOT
fixed. Instead of the compiler aborting, it now creates broken object
code that will segfault on whatever code previously triggered this
behaviour
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 552314
Bug #552314 {Done: terps...@debian.org (Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian))} [gcc] gcc
produces invalid mips branch instructions
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove
Package: libstdc++6-4.5-dev
Version: 4.5-20100202-1
Severity: normal
The random-number distributions in C++0x include a special
"one-shot" facility, where the random bounds can be passed to the
generator function. This is explicitly intended (judging from committee
writings, and source comment
14 matches
Mail list logo
