[Bug fortran/42607] add information about how to compile a module

--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-05 05:49 --- (In reply to comment #0) > [forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/501560] > > "gfortran documentation lacks any kind of info about how to create a module > .mod file. It should be quite easy to indicate that the stand

[Bug other/42611] ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:5014

-- fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot |

Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Mon Jan 4 19:03:10 UTC 2010 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: libtemplate-plugin-number-format-perl > tags 563536 + pending Bug #563536 {Done:

[Bug other/42611] ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:5014

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||42146 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42611 --- You

[Bug other/42611] ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:5014

--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 19:19 --- Created an attachment (id=19465) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19465&action=view) gcc45-pr42611.patch Untested fix. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug other/42611] ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:5014

--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-04 18:26 --- Gcc 3.4 gave: r42611.c: In function `foo': pr42611.c:6: error: size of variable 's' is too large -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug other/42611] ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:5014

--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 18:17 --- It is not caused by that commit, just add asm volatile ("" : : "r" (&s)) to the testcase and you'll reproduce it even before that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42611 --- You are receiving th

[Bug other/42611] ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:5014

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 18:12 --- I think this is related to (or a dup of bug 42146). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42611 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

[Bug other/42611] ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:5014

--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-04 18:10 --- It is caused by revision 144914: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-03/msg00421.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Results for 4.5.0 20100103 (experimental) [trunk revision 155588] (Debian 4.5-20100103-1) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 3 16:05:45 UTC 2010 (revision 155588) Target: x86_64-linux-gnu gcc version 4.5.0 20100103 (experimental) [trunk revision 155588] (Debian 4.5-20100103-1) Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/graphi

Results for 4.4.2 (Debian 4.4.2-8) testsuite on mips-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_2_release revision 152840 Target: mips-linux-gnu gcc version 4.4.2 (Debian 4.4.2-8) Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/iinline-1.C scan-ipa-dump inline "String::func

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.5

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.5 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #562881 (http://bugs.debian.org/562881) # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR42541 # * remote st

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.4

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.4 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #560812 (http://bugs.debian.org/560812) # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR42549 # * remote st

[bts-link] source package gcc-defaults

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-defaults # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #558728 (http://bugs.debian.org/558728) # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR42550 # * remo

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.4

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.4 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.o

[Bug target/42553] wrong code with -O1

--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-01-04 16:07 --- (In reply to comment #2) > The inline-asm is totally incorrect here ... Actually, the asm is correct, it is just a couple of volatiles that are missing. Please see arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h from linux-2.6 for correct

[Bug other/42611] ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:5014

--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 15:20 --- Shorter testcase: struct S { int a; char b[2147483647]; }; void foo (void) { struct S s; } with -m32. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/42542] Vectorizer produces incorrect results on max/min of unsigned intergers

--- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 15:14 --- Subject: Bug 42542 Author: hjl Date: Mon Jan 4 15:14:31 2010 New Revision: 155618 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155618 Log: Don't convert GTU to GT for V4SI and V2DI gcc/ 2010-01-04 H.J. Lu

[Bug target/40134] symbols not resolved when building shared libraries (link with -lgcc_s -lgcc?)

--- Comment #6 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 15:13 --- Subject: Bug 40134 Author: doko Date: Mon Jan 4 15:13:08 2010 New Revision: 155617 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155617 Log: 2010-01-04 Mikael Pettersson PR target/42503 B

[Bug fortran/42607] add information about how to compile a module

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607 ---

Bug#377210: marked as done (g++: std::basic_filebuf::pubseekoff works incorrect on amd64)

Your message dated Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:50:31 +0100 with message-id <4b41f227.1080...@debian.org> and subject line Re: g++: std::basic_filebuf::pubseekoff works incorrect on amd64 has caused the Debian Bug report #377210, regarding g++: std::basic_filebuf::pubseekoff works incorrect on amd64 to be

Processed: Re: gcc: -finline-small-functions is overzealous

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 490644 + moreinfo Bug #490644 [gcc] gcc: -finline-small-functions is overzealous Added tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 490644 + upstream Bug #490644 [gcc] gcc: -finline-small-functions is overzealous Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processin

Bug#490644: gcc: -finline-small-functions is overzealous

tags 490644 + moreinfo tags 490644 + upstream thanks please could you recheck with GCC-4.4 and GCC-4.5 (experimental) or gcc-snapshot (unstable)? would it be possible to forwarded and track this report upstream yourself? thanks, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists

Bug#520885: marked as done (apt-get fails on powerpc - Illigal instruction)

Your message dated Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:38:13 +0100 with message-id <4b41ef45.4090...@debian.org> and subject line tagging as wontfix and closing has caused the Debian Bug report #520877, regarding apt-get fails on powerpc - Illigal instruction to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Processed: tagging as wontfix and closing

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 520877 + wontfix Bug #520877 [libstdc++6,gcc] apt-get failes on powerpc - Illigal instruction Bug #495120 [libstdc++6,gcc] apt crash on debian lenny and sid on powerpc: Illegal instruction Bug #520885 [libstdc++6,gcc] apt-get fails on powerp

Bug#495120: marked as done (apt crash on debian lenny and sid on powerpc: Illegal instruction)

Your message dated Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:38:13 +0100 with message-id <4b41ef45.4090...@debian.org> and subject line tagging as wontfix and closing has caused the Debian Bug report #520877, regarding apt crash on debian lenny and sid on powerpc: Illegal instruction to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#520877: marked as done (apt-get failes on powerpc - Illigal instruction)

Your message dated Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:38:13 +0100 with message-id <4b41ef45.4090...@debian.org> and subject line tagging as wontfix and closing has caused the Debian Bug report #520877, regarding apt-get failes on powerpc - Illigal instruction to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 501560 + upstream Bug #501560 [gfortran] [gfortran] Documentation lacks information about how to compile a module Added tag(s) upstream. > forwarded 501560 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR42607 Bug #501560 [gfortran] [gfortran] Documentation lacks info

Processed: forwarded classpath report

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 561317 + upstream Bug #561317 [libgcj10] libgcj10: Method java.net.URL.openConnection(java.net.Proxy) not implemented Added tag(s) upstream. > forwarded 561317 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/PR42606 Bug #561317 [libgcj10] libgcj10: Method java

Processed: Re: Bug#540939: upgrade has broken several packages: gcj-4.4-jre-headless cannot be configured

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 540939 + wontfix Bug #540939 [gcj-4.4-jre-headless] upgrade has broken several packages: gcj-4.4-jre-headless cannot be configured Added tag(s) wontfix. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bu

Bug#540939: marked as done (upgrade has broken several packages: gcj-4.4-jre-headless cannot be configured)

Your message dated Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:11:35 +0100 with message-id <4b41daf7.4010...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#540939: upgrade has broken several packages: gcj-4.4-jre-headless cannot be configured has caused the Debian Bug report #540939, regarding upgrade has broken several packages:

Bug#517832: marked as done (jsvc: Tomcat5.5/s390 doesn't start with default JVM)

Your message dated Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:04:04 +0100 with message-id <4b41d934.1020...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#517832: jsvc: Tomcat5.5/s390 doesn't start with default JVM has caused the Debian Bug report #517832, regarding jsvc: Tomcat5.5/s390 doesn't start with default JVM to be marked

Processed: forwarded classpath report

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 489478 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR42605 Bug #489478 [gcj-4.4-jre] java-gcj-compat-dev: missing output with formatted string Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://gcc.gnu.org/PR42605'. > tags 489478 + upstream Bug #489478 [gcj-4.4-jre] java-

Processed: reassign 400848 to pbuilder

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 400848 pbuilder Bug #400848 [gcc-4.2] pbuilder-satisfydepends chokes on tab characters Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.2' to 'pbuilder'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

gcc-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.changes is NEW

cpp-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.deb to main/g/gcc-4.5/cpp-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.deb fixincludes_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.deb to main/g/gcc-4.5/fixincludes_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.deb g++-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.deb to main/g/gcc-4.5/g++-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.deb gcc-4.5-base_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.deb

gcc-4.5 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): lib32gcc1_4.5-20100103-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says extra. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database

gcc-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_multi.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-4.5-doc_4.5-20100103-1_all.deb to main/g/gcc-4.5/cpp-4.5-doc_4.5-20100103-1_all.deb cpp-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.5/cpp-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_amd64.deb cpp-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_sparc.deb to main/g/gcc-4.5/cpp-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_sparc.deb fixincludes_4.5-20100103

Processing of gcc-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.changes

gcc-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.5-base_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.deb libgcc6_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.deb libgcc6-dbg_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.deb libgomp1_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.deb libgomp1-dbg_4.5-20100103-1_hppa.deb cpp-4.5_4.5-2010010

Processing of gcc-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_multi.changes

gcc-4.5_4.5-20100103-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.5-plugin-dev_4.5-20100103-1_amd64.deb gcc-4.5-base_4.5-20100103-1_sparc.deb gfortran-4.5-multilib_4.5-20100103-1_sparc.deb gcj-4.5-base_4.5-20100103-1_sparc.deb gcj-4.5-jre-headless_4.5-201

Bug#336511: [PR libmudflap/24619] mudflap instrumentation of dlopen is incorrect

mudflap doesn't see much attention upstream; could you recheck/test your patch with gcc-4.4/gcc-4.5? I'll apply it as a local patch then. thanks, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.