Re: [RFC] [Cross Toolchain] Multiarch and sysrooted toolchain

2009-03-14 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, > The toolchain does not yet look in all the right places. Neither for > the multiarch nor the corss-compile way of putting the prefix. It is > in a state where both ways are used and neither is complete enough for > a full system. So, would it be fine to send an addendum to multiarch[1] d

Re: [RFC] [Cross Toolchain] Multiarch and sysrooted toolchain

2009-03-14 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Hector Oron writes: > Hello, > , and there is generally no need to install anything but libraries and headers into /usr/ -- so I don't think there is a pressing need to replicate a filesystem hierarchy standard below a triplet directory. >> >>> True, however, that is not a su

Re: [RFC] [Cross Toolchain] Multiarch and sysrooted toolchain

2009-03-14 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Simon Richter writes: > Hi, > >> >, since >> > they have entirely different objectives > >> Not entirely different - the objective for the packaging tools is >> actually the same, to have packages install cleanly without changes on >> systems with a different architecture triplet. > > I'm not sur

[Bug tree-optimization/36439] [4.3 Regression] very long compile-time in PRE building gimp-plugin-registry

2009-03-14 Thread vapier at gentoo dot org
-- vapier at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toolchain at gentoo dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36